Field Value Correction Note |
1 |
|
26 |
Heapy | Edgar I |
M |
|
Brother in Law |
M |
Oct 21 |
1874 |
27 |
On line 1,
the value for the givens
field is "Edgar I",
the suggested correction is "Edgar J".
The following comment was attached: This is just how this writer makes capital Js. Among many examples, notice that the "J" in James in line 3 is identical.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
2 |
|
27 |
Blatchford | John |
M |
|
Head |
S |
Jan |
1874 |
27 |
On line 2,
the value for the day
field is "0",
the suggested correction is "9". Submitted by Larry A Van Wormer.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
3 |
|
27 |
Spurs | James |
M |
|
Servant |
S |
Jan 18 |
1868 |
32 |
On line 3,
the value for the surname
field is "Spurs",
the suggested correction is "Spiers". Submitted by Larry A Van Wormer.
The following comment was attached: A more likely alternative, looks like ie
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
5 |
|
28 |
Hays | Elizabeth |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Mar 27 |
1862 |
38 |
On line 5,
the value for the month
field is "Mar",
the suggested correction is "May". Submitted by Larry A Van Wormer.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
10 |
|
30 |
Hays | Robert I |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Sep 30 |
1900 |
6/12 |
On line 10,
the value for the givens
field is "Robert I",
the suggested correction is "Robert J".
The following comment was attached: This is just how this writer makes capital Js. Among many examples, notice that the "J" in James in line 3 is identical.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
17 |
|
31 |
Common | George |
M |
|
Partner |
S |
Jun 20 |
1858 |
42 |
On line 17,
the value for the relationship
field is "Partner",
the suggested correction is "Brother".
The following comment was attached: This could read Brother, which is what he was in the 1911 census
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
22 |
|
30 |
Shuttleworth | Joseph |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Oct 22 |
1844 |
55 |
On line 22,
the value for the household
field is "30",
the suggested correction is "33". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
23 |
|
32 |
Shuttleworth | Ilina |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Sep 22 |
1846 |
53 |
On line 23,
the value for the household
field is "32",
the suggested correction is "33". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
24 |
|
32 |
Shuttleworth | Robert A |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 2 |
1873 |
27 |
On line 24,
the value for the household
field is "32",
the suggested correction is "33". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
25 |
|
32 |
Shuttleworth | Annie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 9 |
1880 |
21 |
On line 25,
the value for the household
field is "32",
the suggested correction is "33". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
26 |
|
32 |
Shuttleworth | Joseph |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun 1 |
1886 |
14 |
On line 26,
the value for the household
field is "32",
the suggested correction is "33". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
27 |
|
32 |
Johnston | Fred |
M |
|
Servant |
S |
Jun 10 |
1878 |
22 |
On line 27,
the value for the household
field is "32",
the suggested correction is "33". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
28 |
|
34 |
Richardson | Joce |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jun 1 |
1850 |
50 |
On line 28,
the value for the givens
field is "Joce",
the suggested correction is "Joel". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
28 |
|
34 |
Richardson | Joce |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jun 1 |
1850 |
50 |
On line 28,
the value for the givens
field is "Joce",
the suggested correction is "Ira". Submitted by Larry A Van Wormer.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
33 |
|
34 |
Richardson | Carrie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 20 |
1895 |
5 |
On line 33,
the value for the year
field is "1895",
the suggested correction is "1896". Submitted by Larry A Van Wormer.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
36 |
|
35 |
Desmind | Edward |
M |
|
Lodger |
M |
Apr 10 |
1869 |
31 |
On line 36,
the value for the surname
field is "Desmind",
the suggested correction is "Desmnd". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: should be Desmond, Edward and Desmond, Elizabeth
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
36 |
|
35 |
Desmind | Edward |
M |
|
Lodger |
M |
Apr 10 |
1869 |
31 |
On line 36,
the value for the surname
field is "Desmind",
the suggested correction is "Desmond". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
37 |
|
35 |
Desmobd | Elizabeth |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Aug 12 |
1867 |
32 |
On line 37,
the value for the surname
field is "Desmobd",
the suggested correction is "Desmond". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
41 |
|
36 |
Johnston | Margaret I |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Aug 22 |
1864 |
36 |
On line 41,
the value for the givens
field is "Margaret I",
the suggested correction is "Margaret J".
The following comment was attached: This is just how this writer makes capital Js. Among many examples, notice that the "J" in James in line 3 is identical.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
45 |
|
36 |
Johnston | Islay C |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
May 20 |
1900 |
2/12 |
On line 45,
the value for the age
field is "2/12",
the suggested correction is "12/12". Submitted by Larry A Van Wormer.
The following comment was attached: per original, and it seems correct
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
50 |
|
37 |
Smith | Mary F |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Feb 5 |
1861 |
39 |
On line 50,
the value for the givens
field is "Mary F",
the suggested correction is "Mary I". Submitted by Larry A Van Wormer.
|
|