Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		508	Indian Jack	M		Head	M			34
2		508	Indian Agnes	F		Wife	M			35
3
4		509	Indian Antoine	M		Head	M			28
5		509	Indian Julia	F		Wife	M			23
6		509	Indian Nancy	F		Daughter	S			2
7
8		510	Milo Daniel	M		Head	M			25
9		510	Milo Emily	F		Wife	M			19
10		510	Milo Francis	M		Son	S			2
11		510	Indian Mary	F		Mother-in-law	W			61
12
13		601	Indian Jimmy Jack	M		Head	M			35
14		601	Indian Annie	F		Wife	M			36
15		601	Indian Agnes	F		Stepdaughter	S			16
16		601	Indian George	M		Son	S			7
17		601	Indian Henry	M		Son	S			5
18		601	Indian Jassie	F		Daughter	S			2
19		601	Indian Alice	F		Daughter	S			1
20
21		602	Indian Jack Marchell	M		Head	M			49
22		602	Indian Lucy	F		Wife	M			32
23		602	Indian Presedia	F		Daughter	S			1
24
25		603	Indian James Jack	M		Head	M			49
26		603	Indian Cecelia	F		Wife	M			40
27		603	Indian Matilda	F		Daughter	S			10
28		603	Indian Peter	M		Son	S			5
29
30		604	Uslick Jack	M		Head	M			40
31		604	Uslick Annie	F		Wife	M			40
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50

Line Notes On This Page

The following note applies to line 13:

'Indians of Tzeachten Reserve '

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
13		601	Indian	Jimmy Jack	M		Head	M			35
On line 13, the value for the surname field is "Indian", the suggested correction is "Jimmy".
This correction was evaluated by Kevin Hanit: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
14		601	Indian	Annie	F		Wife	M			36
On line 14, the value for the surname field is "Indian", the suggested correction is "Jimmy".
This correction was evaluated by Kevin Hanit: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
16		601	Indian	George	M		Son	S			7
On line 16, the value for the surname field is "Indian", the suggested correction is "Jimmy".
This correction was evaluated by Kevin Hanit: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
17		601	Indian	Henry	M		Son	S			5
On line 17, the value for the surname field is "Indian", the suggested correction is "Jimmy".
This correction was evaluated by Kevin Hanit: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
18		601	Indian	Jassie	F		Daughter	S			2
On line 18, the value for the surname field is "Indian", the suggested correction is "Jimmy".
This correction was evaluated by Kevin Hanit: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
19		601	Indian	Alice	F		Daughter	S			1
On line 19, the value for the surname field is "Indian", the suggested correction is "Jimmy".
This correction was evaluated by Kevin Hanit: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
21		602	Indian	Jack Marchell	M		Head	M			49
On line 21, the value for the surname field is "Indian", the suggested correction is "Jack".
This correction was evaluated by Kevin Hanit: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
22		602	Indian	Lucy	F		Wife	M			32
On line 22, the value for the surname field is "Indian", the suggested correction is "Jack".
This correction was evaluated by Kevin Hanit: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
23		602	Indian	Presedia	F		Daughter	S			1
On line 23, the value for the surname field is "Indian", the suggested correction is "Jack".
This correction was evaluated by Kevin Hanit: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
25		603	Indian	James Jack	M		Head	M			49
On line 25, the value for the surname field is "Indian", the suggested correction is "James".
This correction was evaluated by Kevin Hanit: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
26		603	Indian	Cecelia	F		Wife	M			40
On line 26, the value for the surname field is "Indian", the suggested correction is "James".
This correction was evaluated by Kevin Hanit: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
27		603	Indian	Matilda	F		Daughter	S			10
On line 27, the value for the surname field is "Indian", the suggested correction is "James".
This correction was evaluated by Kevin Hanit: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
28		603	Indian	Peter	M		Son	S			5
On line 28, the value for the surname field is "Indian", the suggested correction is "James".
This correction was evaluated by Kevin Hanit: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: b-1 District: ABORIGINAL AGENCIES National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com