Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
@ next to the line number indicates contact information for someone researching this person, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description								Links
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		25	Hass William	M		Son	S	Jan 15	1891	10	01
2		25	Hass Lisvesia	F		Daughter	S	May 21	1893	7	01
3		25	Hass Fred	M		Son	S	Oct 23	1896	4	01
4		25	Hass Emmy	F		Daughter	S	Mar 31	1899	2	01
5		26	Hutson George	M		Head	M	Mar 1	1851	50
6		26	Hutson Elisebet	F		Wife	M	Jun 19	1855	45
7		26	Hutson William P	M		Son	S	Jan 13	1882	19
8		26	Hutson Charles R	M		Son	S	Jan 23	1884	17
9		26	Hutson Elise M	F		Daughter	S	Jul 9	1887	13
10		26	Hutson George R	M		Son	S	Feb 4	1890	11
11		26	Hutson James S	M		Son	S	May 27	1892	8	01
12		26	Hutson Ethel	F		Daughter	S	Apr 22	1895	5
13		26	Hutson Lessly	M		Son	S	Aug 4	1897	3
@ 14		27	Becket Edward	M		Head	M	Nov 12	1854	46	01
15		27	Becket Eliasbet	F		Wife	M	Jan 20	1854	47	01
16		27	Becket James R	M		Son	S	Sep 28	1881	20	01
17		27	Becket John H	M		Son	S	Jan 9	1882	19	01
18		27	Becket Alven A	M		Son	S	Feb 4	1885	16	01
19		27	Becket Willie I	M		Head	S	Nov 4	1888	12	01
20		28	Riesoft Edward	M		Head	M	Mar 1	1856	45
21		28	Riesoft Anna	F		Wife	M	Jan 19	1854	47
22		28	Riesoft William J	M		Son	S	Mar 9	1881	20
23		28	Riesoft Thomas	M		Son	S	Jan 29	1884	17
24		28	Riesoft James	M		Son	S	Oct 8	1886	14
25		28	Riesoft Eley	F		Daughter	S	Aug 10	1887	13
26		28	Riesoft Lisia	F		Daughter	S	Mar 12	1890	11
27		28	Riesoft Annie	F		Daughter	S	Aug 30	1892	8
28		29	Becket James	M		Head	W	Mar 9	1823	78
29		29	Becket John	M		Son	S	Sep 1	1849	52
30		29	Becket James	M		Son	S	Mar 1	1858	43
31		29	Plant Elisebet	F		Domestic	W	Feb 1	1847	54
32		29	Plant Catherin E	F		Domestic	S	Jul 17	1888	12
33		29	Plant Mary J	F		Domestic	S	Mar 18	1891	10
34		30	Becket William	M		Head	W	Mar 18	1832	69
35		31	Starchwood Joseph	M		Head	M	Apr 1	1850	51
36		31	Starchwood Elenia	F		Wife	M	Apr 1	1862	39
37		31	Starchwood Mary	F		Daughter	S	Mar 1	1882	19
38		31	Starchwood Hany	F		Daughter	S	Jan 1	1888	13
39		31	Starchwood Ann	F		Daughter	S	Feb 1	1892	9
40		31	Starchwood Amelank	F		Daughter	S	Dec 13	1892	8
41		31	Starchwood Rose	F		Head	M	Nov 19	1895	6
42		31	Starchwood Michael	M		Son	S	Mar 1	1897	4
43		31	Starchwood Joseph S.	M		Son	S	Oct 1	1898	2
@ 44		32	Ludgate Michiel	M		Head	M	Mar 21	1841	60
@ 45		32	Ludgate Mary	F		Wife	M	Mar 17	1843	58	01
@ 46		32	Ludgate Bridget	F		Daughter	S	Apr 1	1871	30	01
@ 47		32	Ludgate Alice	F		Daughter	S	May 1	1875	26	01
@ 48		32	Ludgate Ann	F		Daughter	S	Jan 15	1878	23	011
49		33	Kennedy Mich	M		Head	M	Mar 17	1824	77
@ 50		33	Kennedy Hanora	F		Wife	M	Mar 17	1841	60

Line Notes On This Page

The following note applies to line 7:

'For lines 7 through 14, the enumerator badly wrote the year which has been rectified.'

Surname Notes On This Page

In household 28, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Riesoft', a suggested alternative surname is 'Riecroft/Rycroft'.

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
7		26	Hutson	William P	M		Son	S	Jan 13	1882	19
On line 7, the value for the year field is "1882", the suggested correction is "182". Submitted by Tracey Sheady. The following comment was attached: Should be 1882, but only says 182
This correction was evaluated by Michel Dubois: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: A note is posted.
Field Value Correction Note
7		26	Hutson	William P	M		Son	S	Jan 13	1882	19
On line 7, the value for the year field is "1882", the suggested correction is "182". Submitted by Tracey Sheady. The following comment was attached: Should be 1882, but only says 182
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 182 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
13		26	Hutson	Lessly	M		Son	S	Aug 4	1897	3
On line 13, the value for the year field is "1897", the suggested correction is "197". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Michel Dubois: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
13		26	Hutson	Lessly	M		Son	S	Aug 4	1897	3
On line 13, the value for the year field is "1897", the suggested correction is "197". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 197 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
18		27	Becket	Alven A	M		Son	S	Feb 4	1885	16
On line 18, the value for the year field is "1885", the suggested correction is "185". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 185 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
18		27	Becket	Alven A	M		Son	S	Feb 4	1885	16
On line 18, the value for the year field is "1885", the suggested correction is "185". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Michel Dubois: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
19		27	Becket	Willie I	M		Head	S	Nov 4	1888	12
On line 19, the value for the year field is "1888", the suggested correction is "188". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Michel Dubois: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
19		27	Becket	Willie I	M		Head	S	Nov 4	1888	12
On line 19, the value for the year field is "1888", the suggested correction is "188". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 188 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
20		28	Riesoft	Edward	M		Head	M	Mar 1	1856	45
On line 20, the value for the surname field is "Riesoft?", the suggested correction is "Recroft?". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
23		28	Riesoft	Thomas	M		Son	S	Jan 29	1884	17
On line 23, the value for the year field is "1884", the suggested correction is "184". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 184 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
24		28	Riesoft	James	M		Son	S	Oct 8	1886	14
On line 24, the value for the year field is "1886", the suggested correction is "186". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 186 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
24		28	Riesoft	James	M		Son	S	Oct 8	1886	14
On line 24, the value for the year field is "1886", the suggested correction is "186". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 186
Field Value Correction Note
25		28	Riesoft	Eley	F		Daughter	S	Aug 10	1887	13
On line 25, the value for the year field is "1887", the suggested correction is "187". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 187 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
27		28	Riesoft	Annie	F		Daughter	S	Aug 30	1892	8
On line 27, the value for the year field is "1900", the suggested correction is "1902". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: A change other than the suggested correction has been made, I have checked the image of the original form and agree with the current value This comment was added: 1902 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
32		29	Plant	Catherin E	F		Domestic	S	Jul 17	1888	12
On line 32, the value for the year field is "1888", the suggested correction is "188". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 188 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.

Researcher contact information

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: g-1 District: RENFREW (South/Sud) National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com