Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
@ next to the line number indicates contact information for someone researching this person, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		115	St. Louis Amados	M		Son	S	May 5	1882	18
2		115	St. Louis Michell	M		Son	S	Mar 5	1883	16
3		115	St. Louis Edmund	M		Son	S	Feb 17	1888	13
4		115	St. Louis Joseph	M		Son	S	Apr 27	1890	10
@ 5		115	St. Louis Sam	M		Son	S	Feb 3	1882	8
6		115	St. Louis Mary	F		Daughter	S	May 7	1894	6
@ 7		115	St. Louis Soffia	F		Daughter	S	Feb 20	1897	4
8		115	St. Louis Desaria	M		Son	S	Apr 14	1899	1
9		116	Burger Antwine	M		Head	M	Mar 4	1833	68
10		116	Burger Abelenia	F		Wife	M	May 20	1836	64
11		116	Burger Peter	M		Son	S	Sep 15	1872	28
12		116	Aubry Antwine	M		Domestic	S	Nov 30	1887	13
13		117	Greaves Joseph	M		Head	S	Nov 30	1867	33
14		117	Greaves Jane	F		Mother	S	Nov 30	1835	65
15		118	Ludgate George	M		Head	M	Jun 25	1865	35
16		118	Ludgate Emmy	F		Wife	M	Apr 28	1868	32
17		118	Ludgate Michael	M		Son	S	Aug 13	1890	10
18		118	Ludgate Mary H.	F		Daughter	S	Sep 25	1893	7
19		118	Ludgate Celenia	F		Daughter	S	Feb 19	1897	4
20		118	Ludgate Emmy T.	F		Daughter	S	Jul 8	1898	2
21		118	Ludgate Albert J.	M		Son	S	Nov 18	1900	0
22		119	Larmo Antoine V.	M		Head	M	Apr 6	1856	44
23		119	Larmo Ellen	F		Wife	M	Mar 17	1861	39
24		119	Larmo Mary E.	F		Daughter	S	Apr 7	1886	14
25		119	Larmo John P.	M		Son	S	Jun 30	1889	11
26		119	Larmo Maggy J.	F		Daughter	S	May 8	1891	9
27		119	Larmo Josep A.	M		Son	S	May 4	1893	7
28		119	Larmo Hannah C.	F		Daughter	S	Jan 27	1896	5
29		119	Larmo Frances J.	M		Son	S	Mar 27	1898	3
30		120	St. Louis Paul	M		Head	M	Oct 1	1861	39
31		120	St. Louis Rosel	F		Wife	M	Sep 4	1868	32
32		120	St. Louis Rosel	F		Daughter	S	Apr 20	1886	14
33		120	St. Louis Rafell	M		Son	S	May 29	1889	11
34		120	St. Louis Margaret	F		Daughter	S	Jun 23	1892	8
35		120	St. Louis Marg	F		Daughter	S	Aug 27	1894	6
36		120	St. Louis Malvenia	F		Daughter	S	Dec 19	1896	4
37		120	St. Louis Elisibeth	F		Daughter	S	May 14	1899	1
38		121	Larmo Edward	M		Head	M	Apr 1	1871	29
39		121	Larmo Mary	F		Wife	M	Aug 8	1876	30
40		121	Larmo Joseph E.	M		Son	S	Oct 24	1895	5
41		121	Larmo Mary C.	F		Daughter	S	May 26	1897	3
42		121	Larmo Peter Y.	M		Son	S	Sep 3	1900	0
43		122	Belile Celess	M		Head	M	Dec 1	1859	41
44		122	Belile Aleive	F		Wife	M	Mar 21	1868	33
45		122	Belile Mary	F		Daughter	S	Mar 4	1890	11
46		122	Belile Alford	M		Son	S	Jan 4	1891	9
47		122	Belile Melia	F		Daughter	S	May 2	1893	7
48		122	Belile Toughfield	M		Son	S	Aug 3	1894	6
49		122	Belile Antwine	M		Son	S	Nov 20	1895	5
50		122	Belile Tessy	F		Daughter	S	Jun 27	1896	4

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
17		118	Ludgate	Michael	M		Son	S	Aug 13	1890	10
On line 17, the value for the year field is "1890", the suggested correction is "190". Submitted by Tracey Sheady. The following comment was attached: Enumerator often leaves a digit out of birth year
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: A change other than the suggested correction has been made, I have checked the image of the original form and agree with the current value
Field Value Correction Note
20		118	Ludgate	Emmy T.	F		Daughter	S	Jul 8	1898	2
On line 20, the value for the givens field is "Emmy A.", the suggested correction is "Emmy T?". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: The suggested change has been made
Field Value Correction Note
21		118	Ludgate	Albert J.	M		Son	S	Nov 18	1900	0
On line 21, the value for the age field is "0", the suggested correction is "". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and decided to make a change other than what the correction suggested.
Field Value Correction Note
21		118	Ludgate	Albert J.	M		Son	S	Nov 18	1900	0
On line 21, the value for the age field is "0", the suggested correction is "". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
21		118	Ludgate	Albert J.	M		Son	S	Nov 18	1900	0
On line 21, the value for the age field is "0", the suggested correction is "". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
26		119	Larmo	Maggy J.	F		Daughter	S	May 8	1891	9
On line 26, the value for the year field is "1891", the suggested correction is "191". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 191 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
27		119	Larmo	Josep A.	M		Son	S	May 4	1893	7
On line 27, the value for the year field is "1893", the suggested correction is "193". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 193 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
28		119	Larmo	Hannah C.	F		Daughter	S	Jan 27	1896	5
On line 28, the value for the year field is "1896", the suggested correction is "196". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 196 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
29		119	Larmo	Frances J.	M		Son	S	Mar 27	1898	3
On line 29, the value for the year field is "1898", the suggested correction is "198". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 198 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
32		120	St. Louis	Rosel	F		Daughter	S	Apr 20	1886	14
On line 32, the value for the year field is "1886", the suggested correction is "186". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 186 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
33		120	St. Louis	Rafell	M		Son	S	May 29	1889	11
On line 33, the value for the year field is "1889", the suggested correction is "189". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 189 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
34		120	St. Louis	Margaret	F		Daughter	S	Jun 23	1892	8
On line 34, the value for the year field is "1892", the suggested correction is "192". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 192 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
35		120	St. Louis	Marg	F		Daughter	S	Aug 27	1894	6
On line 35, the value for the year field is "1894", the suggested correction is "194". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 194 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
36		120	St. Louis	Malvenia	F		Daughter	S	Dec 19	1896	4
On line 36, the value for the year field is "1896", the suggested correction is "196". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 196 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
37		120	St. Louis	Elisibeth	F		Daughter	S	May 14	1899	1
On line 37, the value for the year field is "1899", the suggested correction is "199". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: 199 is not a valid date, therefore I have transcribed the appropriate year based on age.
Field Value Correction Note
42		121	Larmo	Peter Y.	M		Son	S	Sep 3	1900	0
On line 42, the value for the age field is "0", the suggested correction is "". Submitted by Tracey Sheady.
This correction was evaluated by Jacqui Chisamore: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.

Researcher contact information

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: g-1 District: RENFREW (South/Sud) National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com