Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33		1	Cyr Josiph	M		Head	M	Mar 2	1869	32
34		1	Cyr Eugenia	F		Wife	M	Nov 29	1865	35
35		1	Cyr Lina	F		Daughter	S	Jan 31	1889	13
36		1	Cyr Candide	F		Daughter	S	Apr 2	1891	9
37		1	Cyr Clarisa	M		Son	S	Jul 8	1894	6
38		1	Cyr Edward	M		Son	S	Aug 27	1896	4
39		2	Clemis Dan	M		Head	M	Jul 25	1850	50
40		2	Clemis Margaret	F		Wife	M	Nov 29	1855	45
41		2	Clemis Annie	F		Daughter	S	Dec 12	1873	27
42		2	Clemis Cecilia	F		Daughter	S	Nov 19	1875	25
43		2	Wedge William	M		Lodger	S	Mar 15	1888	13
44		3	Swain William	M		Head	S	Aug 14	1870	30
45		3	Swain Walter	M		Brother	S	Dec 5	1871	29
46		3	Kelly James	M		Employee	S	Jul 5	1881	19
47		4	Matiosis Martin	M		Head	M	Nov 27	1860	40
48		4	Matiosis Elsa	F		Wife	M	Nov 30	1860	40
49		4	Matiosis Maria	F		Daughter	S	Jun 31	1888	12
50		4	Matiosis Christopher	M		Son	S	Dec 6	1892	8

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
33		1	Cyr	Josiph	M		Head	M	Mar 2	1869	32
On line 33, the value for the month field is "Mar", the suggested correction is " ".
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
33		1	Cyr	Josiph	M		Head	M	Mar 2	1869	32
On line 33, the value for the givens field is "Josph", the suggested correction is "".
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
33		1	Cyr	Josiph	M		Head	M	Mar 2	1869	32
On line 33, the value for the maritalStatus field is "M", the suggested correction is " ".
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
33		1	Cyr	Josiph	M		Head	M	Mar 2	1869	32
On line 33, the value for the surname field is "Cyr", the suggested correction is "".
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
33		1	Cyr	Josiph	M		Head	M	Mar 2	1869	32
On line 33, the value for the age field is "32", the suggested correction is "".
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
33		1	Cyr	Josiph	M		Head	M	Mar 2	1869	32
On line 33, the value for the relationship field is "Head", the suggested correction is " ". The following comment was attached: Blank lines need to be transcribed as well
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
33		1	Cyr	Josiph	M		Head	M	Mar 2	1869	32
On line 33, the value for the household field is "1", the suggested correction is "".
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
33		1	Cyr	Josiph	M		Head	M	Mar 2	1869	32
On line 33, the value for the year field is "1869", the suggested correction is "".
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
33		1	Cyr	Josiph	M		Head	M	Mar 2	1869	32
On line 33, the value for the relationship field is "Head", the suggested correction is " ". The following comment was attached: Blank lines need to be transcribed as well
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: ?????
Field Value Correction Note
33		1	Cyr	Josiph	M		Head	M	Mar 2	1869	32
On line 33, the value for the lineNo field is "33", the suggested correction is "1".
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
33		1	Cyr	Josiph	M		Head	M	Mar 2	1869	32
On line 33, the value for the day field is "2", the suggested correction is "".
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
33		1	Cyr	Josiph	M		Head	M	Mar 2	1869	32
On line 33, the value for the sex field is "M", the suggested correction is " ".
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
34		1	Cyr	Eugenia	F		Wife	M	Nov 29	1865	35
On line 34, the value for the lineNo field is "34", the suggested correction is "2". The following comment was attached: Blank lines need to be transcribed as well
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
34		1	Cyr	Eugenia	F		Wife	M	Nov 29	1865	35
On line 34, the value for the lineNo field is "34", the suggested correction is "2". The following comment was attached: Blank lines need to be transcribed as well
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
35		1	Cyr	Lina	F		Daughter	S	Jan 31	1889	13
On line 35, the value for the lineNo field is "35", the suggested correction is "3". The following comment was attached: Blank lines need to be transcribed as well
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
37		1	Cyr	Clarisa	M		Son	S	Jul 8	1894	6
On line 37, the value for the givens field is "Iari??", the suggested correction is "Clari?". Submitted by Krystal Tait.
This correction was evaluated by Barbara Millar: A change other than the suggested correction has been made, I have checked the image of the original form and agree with the current value

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: g-6 District: PROVENCHER National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com