Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description								Links
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		20	Cro?thwat Malon	M		Head	M	Nov 3	1865	35	01
2		20	Cro?thwat Clara M.	F		Wife	M	May 7	1870	30
3		20	Cro?thwat Harry P.	M		Son	S	Sep 10	1891	9
4		21	Lampman Archal	M		Head	M	Dec 27	1842	58
5		21	Lampman Elsia	F		Wife	M	Oct 5	1845	55	01
6		21	Lampman Charles	M		Son	S	Nov 20	188?	16	01
7		22	Innes James	M		Head	M	Aug 28	1841	59	01
8		22	Innes Martha	F		Wife	M	Mar 28	1840	60
9		22	Innes James A.	M		Son	S	Sep 24	1873	27
10		22	Innes Edna	F		Daughter	S	Sep 9	1875	25	01
11		23	Dean William	M		Head	M	Jul 15	1839	61	01
12		23	Dean Orilla	F		Wife	M	Jun 15	1836	64
13		24	?ery William A.	M		Head	M	Aug 1	1859	41
14		24	?ery Margaret A.	F		Wife	M	Apr 7	1860	41
15		24	?ery Ada C.	F		Sister	S	Apr 10	1855	46
16		25	Tucker George	M		Head	M	Mar 15	1824	77
17		25	Tucker Mary A.	F		Wife	M	May 20	1831	69
18		25	Malarky James	M		Adopted Son	S	Feb 19	1864	37
19		26	Cuthbert Cathern	F		Head	W	Mar 15	1827	74
20		26	Cuthbert Marion	F		Daughter	S	Feb 24	1857	44
21		26	Cuthbert John S.	M		Son	S	Mar 26	1860	40
22		26	Cuthbert Kate	F		Daughter	S	Jun 4	1868	32
23		27	Maginns Artter	M		Head	S	Jan 6	1861	40	01
24		27	Maginns Ada	F		Wife	M	Sep 7	1865	35	01
25		27	Slat Melvina	F		Mother-in-law	W	Oct 17	1845	55	01
25		27	Maginns Morley	M		Son	S	Apr 26	1888	12	01
26		28	Hughes Peter	M		Head	M	Jun 16	1865	35	01
27		28	Hughes Lanah R.	F		Wife	M	Jun 10	1866	34	01
28		28	Hughes Ramande D.	M		Son	S	Oct 27	1889	11
29		28	Hughes James S.	M		Son	S	Jul 9	1892	8	01
30		28	Hughes William A.	M		Son	S	Jul 10	1899	1	01
31		29	Farrington William	M		Head	M	Nov 12	1846	54	01
32		29	Farrington Marion B. B.	F		Wife	M	Jan 13	1858	43
33		30	Atche?on Albert	M		Head	M	Jan 3	1855	46	01
34		30	Atche?on Sarah	F		Wife	M	Sep 8	1851	49
35		30	Atche?on Robert I.	M		Son	S	Oct 18	1883	17
36		30	Atche?on Elizabeth A.	F		Daughter	S	Jul 8	1885	15
37		30	Atche?on Sarah E.	F		Daughter	S	Mar 17	1887	14
38		31	Leitch David	M		Head	M	Feb 13	1846	55	01
39		31	Leitch Loisa	F		Wife	M	Mar 2	1846	55
40		32	Thomas John H.	M		Head	M	Mar 7	1856	45	01
41		32	Thomas Delila J.	F		Wife	M	Jul 5	1863	37
42		32	Thomas Velda B.	F		Daughter	S	Jul 26	1896	4
43		33	Orth Abram	M		Head	M	Sep 23	18??	6?	01
44		33	Orth Mrgrat	F		Wife	M	Feb 6	1852	49
45		33	Orth Danial	M		Son	S	Jan 14	1880	21
46		33	Orth Ethel	F		Daughter	S	Mar 21	1882	19
47		33	Orth ??gin	M		Son	S	Nov 26	1883	17	01
48		33	Orth Margreat	F		Daughter	S	Sep 12	1887	13
49		33	Simmons James	M		Laborer	S	May 20	1875	25

Surname Notes On This Page

In household 27, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Maginns', a suggested alternative surname is 'Maginnis'. The person suggesting the alternative surname provided this comment: 'This is a relative of mine and the alternative "Maginnis" is the correct spelling. The given name should be "Arthur".'.

In household 27, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Slat', a suggested alternative surname is 'Slaght'. The person suggesting the alternative surname provided this comment: 'Ada Maginnis' maiden name was "Slaght". I have documented evidence of marriage, etc.'.

In household 27, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Maginns', a suggested alternative surname is 'Slaght'. The person suggesting the alternative surname provided this comment: 'Ada Maginnis' maiden name was "Slaght". I have documented evidence of marriage, etc.'.

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
1		20	Cro?thwat	Malon	M		Head	M	Nov 3	1865	35
On line 1, the value for the surname field is "Cro?thwat", the suggested correction is "Crosthwat". Submitted by Fran Irwin.
Field Value Correction Note
6		21	Lampman	Charles	M		Son	S	Nov 20	188?	16
On line 6, the value for the year field is "188?", the suggested correction is "1884". Submitted by Fran Irwin. The following comment was attached: magnified looks like 4
Field Value Correction Note
13		24	?ery	William A.	M		Head	M	Aug 1	1859	41
On line 13, the value for the surname field is "?ery", the suggested correction is "Werry". Submitted by Fran Irwin. The following comment was attached: 1902 E. Oxford Directory shows Wm. Werry - all letters are there
Field Value Correction Note
23		27	Maginns	Artter	M		Head	S	Jan 6	1861	40
On line 23, the value for the maritalStatus field is "S", the suggested correction is "M". Submitted by Fran Irwin.
Field Value Correction Note
25		27	Slat	Melvina	F		Mother-in-law	W	Oct 17	1845	55
On line 25, the value for the lineNo field is "25", the suggested correction is "26".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
25		27	Slat	Melvina	F		Mother-in-law	W	Oct 17	1845	55
On line 25, the value for the lineNo field is "25", the suggested correction is "26".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
26		28	Hughes	Peter	M		Head	M	Jun 16	1865	35
On line 26, the value for the lineNo field is "26", the suggested correction is "27".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
27		28	Hughes	Lanah R.	F		Wife	M	Jun 10	1866	34
On line 27, the value for the lineNo field is "27", the suggested correction is "28".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
28		28	Hughes	Ramande D.	M		Son	S	Oct 27	1889	11
On line 28, the value for the lineNo field is "28", the suggested correction is "29".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
29		28	Hughes	James S.	M		Son	S	Jul 9	1892	8
On line 29, the value for the lineNo field is "29", the suggested correction is "30".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
30		28	Hughes	William A.	M		Son	S	Jul 10	1899	1
On line 30, the value for the lineNo field is "30", the suggested correction is "31".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
31		29	Farrington	William	M		Head	M	Nov 12	1846	54
On line 31, the value for the lineNo field is "31", the suggested correction is "32".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
32		29	Farrington	Marion B. B.	F		Wife	M	Jan 13	1858	43
On line 32, the value for the lineNo field is "32", the suggested correction is "33".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
33		30	Atche?on	Albert	M		Head	M	Jan 3	1855	46
On line 33, the value for the surname field is "Atche?on", the suggested correction is "Atcheson". Submitted by Fran Irwin.
Field Value Correction Note
33		30	Atche?on	Albert	M		Head	M	Jan 3	1855	46
On line 33, the value for the lineNo field is "33", the suggested correction is "34".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
34		30	Atche?on	Sarah	F		Wife	M	Sep 8	1851	49
On line 34, the value for the lineNo field is "34", the suggested correction is "35".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
35		30	Atche?on	Robert I.	M		Son	S	Oct 18	1883	17
On line 35, the value for the lineNo field is "35", the suggested correction is "36".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
35		30	Atche?on	Robert I.	M		Son	S	Oct 18	1883	17
On line 35, the value for the givens field is "Robert I.", the suggested correction is "Robert J.". Submitted by Fran Irwin.
Field Value Correction Note
36		30	Atche?on	Elizabeth A.	F		Daughter	S	Jul 8	1885	15
On line 36, the value for the lineNo field is "36", the suggested correction is "37".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
37		30	Atche?on	Sarah E.	F		Daughter	S	Mar 17	1887	14
On line 37, the value for the lineNo field is "37", the suggested correction is "38".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
38		31	Leitch	David	M		Head	M	Feb 13	1846	55
On line 38, the value for the lineNo field is "38", the suggested correction is "39".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
39		31	Leitch	Loisa	F		Wife	M	Mar 2	1846	55
On line 39, the value for the lineNo field is "39", the suggested correction is "40".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
40		32	Thomas	John H.	M		Head	M	Mar 7	1856	45
On line 40, the value for the lineNo field is "40", the suggested correction is "41".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
41		32	Thomas	Delila J.	F		Wife	M	Jul 5	1863	37
On line 41, the value for the day field is "5", the suggested correction is "3". Submitted by Fran Irwin.
Field Value Correction Note
41		32	Thomas	Delila J.	F		Wife	M	Jul 5	1863	37
On line 41, the value for the lineNo field is "41", the suggested correction is "42".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
42		32	Thomas	Velda B.	F		Daughter	S	Jul 26	1896	4
On line 42, the value for the lineNo field is "42", the suggested correction is "43".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
43		33	Orth	Abram	M		Head	M	Sep 23	18??	6?
On line 43, the value for the age field is "6?", the suggested correction is "60". Submitted by Fran Irwin.
Field Value Correction Note
43		33	Orth	Abram	M		Head	M	Sep 23	18??	6?
On line 43, the value for the lineNo field is "43", the suggested correction is "44".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
43		33	Orth	Abram	M		Head	M	Sep 23	18??	6?
On line 43, the value for the year field is "18??", the suggested correction is "1840". Submitted by Fran Irwin.
Field Value Correction Note
44		33	Orth	Mrgrat	F		Wife	M	Feb 6	1852	49
On line 44, the value for the lineNo field is "44", the suggested correction is "45".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
45		33	Orth	Danial	M		Son	S	Jan 14	1880	21
On line 45, the value for the lineNo field is "45", the suggested correction is "46".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
46		33	Orth	Ethel	F		Daughter	S	Mar 21	1882	19
On line 46, the value for the lineNo field is "46", the suggested correction is "47".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
47		33	Orth	??gin	M		Son	S	Nov 26	1883	17
On line 47, the value for the lineNo field is "47", the suggested correction is "48".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
47		33	Orth	??gin	M		Son	S	Nov 26	1883	17
On line 47, the value for the givens field is "??gin", the suggested correction is "Elgin". Submitted by Fran Irwin. The following comment was attached: microfilm on reader shows Elgin
Field Value Correction Note
48		33	Orth	Margreat	F		Daughter	S	Sep 12	1887	13
On line 48, the value for the lineNo field is "48", the suggested correction is "49".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made
Field Value Correction Note
49		33	Simmons	James	M		Laborer	S	May 20	1875	25
On line 49, the value for the lineNo field is "49", the suggested correction is "50".
This correction was evaluated by Susan Sorensen: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: g-2 District: OXFORD (South/Sud) National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com