Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
@ next to the line number indicates contact information for someone researching this person, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description								Links
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		79	Dall Minie	F		Daughter	S	Dec 23	1895	6	01
2		79	Dall Grace	F		Daughter	S	Oct 23	1897	3	01
3		79	Dall Mary	F		Daughter	S	Oct 17	1899	2	01
4		79	Dall John	M		Father	M	Aug 10	1814	86
5		79	Dall Augusta	F		Mother	M	Sep 21	1816	84
6		80	Mcloud Arthur	M		Head	M	Oct 17	1860	41	01
7		80	Mcloud Lauria	F		Wife	M	Aug 30	1858	39
8		80	Mcloud Priscilla	F		Daughter	S	Jan 30	1888	13	01
9		80	Mcloud Elsa	F		Daughter	S	Jul 4	1891	10	01
10		80	Mcloud Giddie	M		Son	S	Nov 5	1895	6	01
11		81	Bohanon Nathaniel	M		Head	M	Sep 5	18?8	59	01
12		81	Bohanon Martha	F		Wife	M	May 3	1863	48	01
13		81	Bohanon Ida	F		Daughter	S	Jul 14	1877	23
14		81	Bohanon Eleazer	M		Son	S	Dec 3	1885	17	01
15		81	Bohanon Lavina	F		Daughter	M	Oct 5	1881	19	01
16		81	Rhino Fredreck	M		Son-in-Law	M	Apr 11	1868	33	01
17		81	Fredreck Alonzo	M		Son	S	Dec 3	1888	12	01
18		82	Thompson James	M		Head	M	Oct 8	1847	54	01
19		82	Thompson Augusta	F		Wife	M	Feb 4	1864	37	01
20		82	Thompson Jessy	F		Daughter	S	May 16	1899	1	01
21		82	Thompson Ann	F		Mother	W	Jan 9	1814	87
22		83	Griffith James	M		Head	S	Jun 2	1841	58
23		83	Griffith William	M		Brother	W	Apr 4	1845	55	01
24		83	Griffith Mary	F		Sister	S	Mar 6	1838	63	01
25		83	Griffith William C.	M		Nephew	S	Jan 3	1884	17	01
26		80	Mcloud Stanley	M		?	S	Jul 18	1882	18
27		80	Mcloud Enos	M		?	S		1884	16
28		84	Hemeon Winslow	M		Head	M	Apr 29	1852	47	01
29		84	Hemeon Cora	F		Wife	M	Jan 3	1860	41	01
30		84	Hemeon Maston	M		Son	S	Jul 9	1882	19
31		84	Hemeon Enness	M		Son	S	Oct 20	1895	6
32		84	Hemeon John	M		Father	W	Oct 2	1825	76
@ 33		85	Pierce Dunkan	M		Head	M	Oct 12	1853	48	01
34		85	Pierce Mary	F		Wife	M	Sep 19	1854	47	01
35		85	Pierce William	M		Son	S	Jul 19	1880	21
36		85	Pierce Clara	F		Daughter	S	Apr 13	1882	18
37		85	Pierce John	M		Son	S	Mar 17	1885	16	01
38		85	Pierce Abby	F		Daughter	S	Jun 20	1891	10	01
39		85	Pierce Mary	F		Daughter	S	Jun 16	1894	7	01
40		85	Pierce Helen	F		Daughter	S	Sep 28	1899	2
41		85	Pierce Angie	F		Daughter	S	Aug 18	1889	12	01M
42		86	Pierce Hugh	M		Head	M	Jan 12	1861	40	01
43		86	Pierce Rushie	F		Wife	M	Jun 2	1865	35
44		86	Pierce Bertram	M		Son	S	Aug 3	1885	16	01
45		86	Pierce Ellen	F		Daughter	S	Aug 13	1887	14
46		86	Pierce Idella	F		Daughter	S	Sep 26	1890	10	01
47		86	Pierce Elwell	M		Son	S	Apr 4	1893	8	01
48		86	Pierce Hugh	M		Son	S	Sep 20	1896	5	01
49		86	Pierce Arche	M		Son	S	Dec 20	1898	3	01
50		86	Pierce Mary	F		Daughter	S	Dec 19	1900	3 mos.	01

Line Notes On This Page

The following note applies to line 6:

'note added: look below (to lines 26 and 27 for more family)'

The following note applies to line 16:

'The enumerator wrote Fredreck, Rhino.'

The following note applies to line 26:

'note added: ommitted from family 80 above'

Surname Notes On This Page

In household 81, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Rhino', a suggested alternative surname is 'Rhyno'. The person suggesting the alternative surname provided this comment: 'Frederick RHYNO'.

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
7		80	Mcloud	Lauria	F		Wife	M	Aug 30	1858	39
On line 7, the value for the givens field is "Lauria?", the suggested correction is "Laura". Submitted anonymously.
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The original says LAURIA.
Field Value Correction Note
7		80	Mcloud	Lauria	F		Wife	M	Aug 30	1858	39
On line 7, the value for the givens field is "Lauria?", the suggested correction is "Laura". Submitted anonymously.
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
7		80	Mcloud	Lauria	F		Wife	M	Aug 30	1858	39
On line 7, the value for the givens field is "Lauria?", the suggested correction is "Laura". Submitted anonymously.
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
9		80	Mcloud	Elsa	F		Daughter	S	Jul 4	1891	10
On line 9, the value for the givens field is "Elsa", the suggested correction is "Elsie". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Family knowledge
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
9		80	Mcloud	Elsa	F		Daughter	S	Jul 4	1891	10
On line 9, the value for the givens field is "Elsa", the suggested correction is "Elsie". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Family knowledge
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
9		80	Mcloud	Elsa	F		Daughter	S	Jul 4	1891	10
On line 9, the value for the givens field is "Elsa", the suggested correction is "Elsie". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Family knowledge
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The original says ELSA.
Field Value Correction Note
10		80	Mcloud	Giddie	M		Son	S	Nov 5	1895	6
On line 10, the value for the givens field is "Giddie?", the suggested correction is "Gideon". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Obviously Giddie was what he was called at that time
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The original says GIDDIE so that is what I typed.
Field Value Correction Note
16		81	Rhino	Fredreck	M		Son-in-Law	M	Apr 11	1868	33
On line 16, the value for the givens field is "Rhino", the suggested correction is "Frederick". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Line 16: The Surname should be Rhyno , Given Frederick
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: In the original the given name is spelled Fredreck.
Field Value Correction Note
16		81	Rhino	Fredreck	M		Son-in-Law	M	Apr 11	1868	33
On line 16, the value for the givens field is "???no", the suggested correction is "Rhyno". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: This is the Surname for Lavinia's husband
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The original reads RHINO FREDRECK.
Field Value Correction Note
16		81	Rhino	Fredreck	M		Son-in-Law	M	Apr 11	1868	33
On line 16, the value for the givens field is "Rhino", the suggested correction is "Frederick". Submitted anonymously.
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: In the original the given name is spelled Fredreck.
Field Value Correction Note
16		81	Rhino	Fredreck	M		Son-in-Law	M	Apr 11	1868	33
On line 16, the value for the givens field is "???no", the suggested correction is "Rhyno". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: This is the Surname for Lavinia's husband
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
16		81	Rhino	Fredreck	M		Son-in-Law	M	Apr 11	1868	33
On line 16, the value for the surname field is "Fredreck", the suggested correction is "Rhyno". Submitted anonymously.
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
16		81	Rhino	Fredreck	M		Son-in-Law	M	Apr 11	1868	33
On line 16, the value for the givens field is "Rhino", the suggested correction is "Frederick". Submitted anonymously.
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
16		81	Rhino	Fredreck	M		Son-in-Law	M	Apr 11	1868	33
On line 16, the value for the surname field is "Fredreck", the suggested correction is "Rhyno". Submitted anonymously.
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: In the original the surname is spelled Rhino.
Field Value Correction Note
16		81	Rhino	Fredreck	M		Son-in-Law	M	Apr 11	1868	33
On line 16, the value for the givens field is "Rhino", the suggested correction is "Frederick". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Line 16: The Surname should be Rhyno , Given Frederick
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
17		81	Fredreck	Alonzo	M		Son	S	Dec 3	1888	12
On line 17, the value for the surname field is "Fredreck", the suggested correction is "Bohanan". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: He is the son of Nathaniel and brother of Lavinia
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The original reads ALONZO FREDRECK.
Field Value Correction Note
30		84	Hemeon	Maston	M		Son	S	Jul 9	1882	19
On line 30, the value for the givens field is "Maston", the suggested correction is "Marston". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Family recollections of two spellings Marsden and Marston
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The original says MASTON.
Field Value Correction Note
30		84	Hemeon	Maston	M		Son	S	Jul 9	1882	19
On line 30, the value for the givens field is "Maston", the suggested correction is "Marston". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Family recollections of two spellings Marsden and Marston
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
30		84	Hemeon	Maston	M		Son	S	Jul 9	1882	19
On line 30, the value for the givens field is "Maston", the suggested correction is "Marston". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Family recollections of two spellings Marsden and Marston
This correction was evaluated by Shirley E. Rathbun: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.

Researcher contact information

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: o District: SHELBURNE & QUEENS National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com