Field Value Correction Note |
1 |
|
1 |
Partridge | William |
M |
|
Head |
M |
May 21 |
1844 |
58 |
On line 1,
the value for the age
field is "58",
the suggested correction is "56". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: Looks slightly different than the 58 below it...I think the enumerator changed his/her mind while writing this one!
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
6 |
|
1 |
Peeler | Isabella |
F |
|
Daughter |
W |
May 9 |
1872 |
28 |
On line 6,
the value for the givens
field is "Isabella",
the suggested correction is "Issablella". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: As it is actually written here.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
20 |
|
5 |
Scott | Hannah |
F |
|
Wife |
S |
Feb 25 |
1846 |
56 |
On line 20,
the value for the maritalStatus
field is "S",
the suggested correction is "M". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: This should be an M for married
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
20 |
|
5 |
Scott | Hannah |
F |
|
Wife |
S |
Feb 25 |
1846 |
56 |
On line 20,
the value for the year
field is "1846",
the suggested correction is "1844". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
20 |
|
5 |
Scott | Hannah |
F |
|
Wife |
S |
Feb 25 |
1846 |
56 |
On line 20,
the value for the month
field is "Feb",
the suggested correction is "Dec". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: The D is formed in this unusual way. See Delgarno, line 18, for example.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
22 |
|
5 |
Scott | David R. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 28 |
1885 |
15 |
On line 22,
the value for the month
field is "Feb",
the suggested correction is "Dec". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: See the D in David, same line, to compare.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
24 |
|
6 |
Cramer | Isabella |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jun 10 |
1878 |
22 |
On line 24,
the value for the givens
field is "Isabella",
the suggested correction is "Issabella". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: As it is written here.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
29 |
|
6 |
Cramer | Robert B. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Sep 13 |
1896 |
4 |
On line 29,
the value for the givens
field is "Robert B.",
the suggested correction is "Robert S". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: Compare to S for Single, line 30.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
31 |
|
8 |
McKay | Samuel |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 4 |
1876 |
35 |
On line 31,
the value for the givens
field is "Samuel",
the suggested correction is "Samul". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
33 |
|
8 |
McKay | Mervyn |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 8 |
1885 |
15 |
On line 33,
the value for the month
field is "Feb",
the suggested correction is "Dec". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: As explained earlier.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
34 |
|
8 |
McKay | Mildrid |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 11 |
1898 |
3 |
On line 34,
the value for the givens
field is "Mildrid",
the suggested correction is "Mildred". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: Possibly this as the down loop of y above could be mistaken for a dot above i.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
38 |
|
9 |
Swalm | Annie Bell |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jul 25 |
1876 |
24 |
On line 38,
the value for the givens
field is "Annie Bell",
the suggested correction is "Anna Bell". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: The last letter might be a, rather than ie.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
46 |
|
11 |
Greyston | Ethel |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jun 2 |
1891 |
9 |
On line 46,
the value for the age
field is "9",
the suggested correction is "10". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
47 |
|
11 |
Greyston | Lillie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jun 2 |
1892 |
9 |
On line 47,
the value for the month
field is "Jun",
the suggested correction is "Jan". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: I think it is this...the enumerator has used the full name of June, earlier on this page. I am thinking the one above may also have been meant as Jan, but the open second letter looks more like u than a so no choice.
|
|