Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		82	Bidler G P	M		Head	M	Jul 31	1860	40
2		82	Bidler M	F		Wife	M	Apr 7	1865	36
3		82	Bidler A A	M		Son	S	Jun 27	1888	12
4		83	Solomon S	M		Head	M	Jul 17	1838	62
5		83	Solomon M	F		Wife	M	Aug 11	1840	60
6		83	Solomon A	M		Son	S	May 26	1866	34
7		83	Solomon A	F		Daughter	S	Feb 2	1875	26
8		84	Bolan C	M		Head	M	May 15	1869	31
9		84	Bolan Daisy	F		Wife	M	Nov 12	1870	30
10		84	Bolan V K	F		Daughter	S	Aug 19	1900	1/2
11		84	Bolan A	F		cousin	S	Mar 3	1880	21
12		84	Thompson I	M		cousin	S	Dec 12	1878	22
13		85	Ward A R	M		Head	M	Aug 31	1864	36
14		85	Ward A. M	F		Wife	M	Jul 11	1870	30
15		85	Ward G. B.	F		Daughter	S	Aug 29	1892	8
16		85	Ward S. F.	F		Daughter	S	Jul 26	1894	6
17		85	Ward A	F		Daughter	S	Jun 10	1896	4
18		85	Ward I C	M		Son	S	Jul 26	1890	2
19		86	Kirby R.	M		Head	S	Nov 29	1874	26
20		86	Attula M.	M		roomer	S	Aug 25	1884	26
21		87	Elliott S	M		Head	M	Aug 22	1872	28
22		87	Elliott M	F		Wife	M	Jul 12	1877	23
23		87	Elliott I	F		Daughter	S	Mar 11	1899	2
24		87	Cascieto I	M		father in law	M	Sep 22	1853	47
25		87	Cascieto E	F		mother in law	M	Jun 9	1860	40
26		87	Cascieto A	F		sister in law	S	Aug 22	1892	8
27		87	Cascieto Thesa	F		sister in law	S	Aug 20	1900	1/2
28		87	Cascieto M	M		bro in law	S	Jun 4	1894	6
29		87	Cascieto Ac?	M		bro in law	S	Jan 4	1896	5
30		87	Cascieto I	F		sister in law	S	Dec 25	1897	3
31		88	Ball Jos	M		Head	M	Feb 15	1849	52
32		88	Ball A	F		Wife	M	Apr 5	1861	40
33		88	Ball S	M		Son	S	Aug 25	1880	20
34		89	Dixon I	M		Head	M	Feb 4	1857	44
35		89	Dixon E	F		Wife	M	Dec 16	1861	39
36		89	Dixon G	F		Daughter	S	Dec 4	1880	20
37		90	Hansard E	M		Head	S	Apr 14	1865	36
38		90	Kearney M	F		roomer	M	Jul 12	1869	31
39		90	Kearney G	M		roomer	S	Jun 14	1887	13
40		91	Poles A. G.	M		Head	M	Sep 21	1865	35
41		91	Poles I.	F		Wife	M	Sep 28	1867	33
42		91	Poles G. A.	M		Son	S	Jan 9	1899	2
43		91	Poles Q. M	F		Daughter	S	Sep 3	1896	4
44		91	Poles G. F	F		Daughter	S	May 7	1894	6
45		92	Dixon Chas	M		Head	M	Jul 11	1871	29
46		92	Dixon K	F		Wife	M	Mar 19	1875	26
47		92	Dixon M	F		Daughter	S	Feb 9	1896	5
48		92	Dixon Wm	M		Son	S	Aug 15	1898	2
49		92	Dixon Geo	M		Son	S	Dec 11	1900	1/2
50		92	Percy F.	F		roomer	W	Aug 14	1853	47

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
11		84	Bolan	A	F		cousin	S	Mar 3	1880	21
On line 11, the value for the otherRelationship field is "cousin", the suggested correction is "Cousin". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
12		84	Thompson	I	M		cousin	S	Dec 12	1878	22
On line 12, the value for the otherRelationship field is "cousin", the suggested correction is "Cousin". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
20		86	Attula	M.	M		roomer	S	Aug 25	1884	26
On line 20, the value for the otherRelationship field is "roomer", the suggested correction is "Roomer". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
24		87	Cascieto	I	M		father in law	M	Sep 22	1853	47
On line 24, the value for the otherRelationship field is "father in law", the suggested correction is "Father in law". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
24		87	Cascieto	I	M		father in law	M	Sep 22	1853	47
On line 24, the value for the household field is "87", the suggested correction is "88". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
25		87	Cascieto	E	F		mother in law	M	Jun 9	1860	40
On line 25, the value for the household field is "87", the suggested correction is "88". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
25		87	Cascieto	E	F		mother in law	M	Jun 9	1860	40
On line 25, the value for the otherRelationship field is "mother in law", the suggested correction is "Mother in law". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
26		87	Cascieto	A	F		sister in law	S	Aug 22	1892	8
On line 26, the value for the household field is "87", the suggested correction is "88". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
26		87	Cascieto	A	F		sister in law	S	Aug 22	1892	8
On line 26, the value for the otherRelationship field is "sister in law", the suggested correction is "Sister in law". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
27		87	Cascieto	Thesa	F		sister in law	S	Aug 20	1900	1/2
On line 27, the value for the otherRelationship field is "sister in law", the suggested correction is "Sister in law". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
27		87	Cascieto	Thesa	F		sister in law	S	Aug 20	1900	1/2
On line 27, the value for the household field is "87", the suggested correction is "88". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
28		87	Cascieto	M	M		bro in law	S	Jun 4	1894	6
On line 28, the value for the otherRelationship field is "bro in law", the suggested correction is "Bro in law". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
28		87	Cascieto	M	M		bro in law	S	Jun 4	1894	6
On line 28, the value for the household field is "87", the suggested correction is "88". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
29		87	Cascieto	Ac?	M		bro in law	S	Jan 4	1896	5
On line 29, the value for the givens field is "Ac?", the suggested correction is "Acton". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
29		87	Cascieto	Ac?	M		bro in law	S	Jan 4	1896	5
On line 29, the value for the household field is "87", the suggested correction is "88". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
29		87	Cascieto	Ac?	M		bro in law	S	Jan 4	1896	5
On line 29, the value for the otherRelationship field is "bro in law", the suggested correction is "Bro in law". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
30		87	Cascieto	I	F		sister in law	S	Dec 25	1897	3
On line 30, the value for the household field is "87", the suggested correction is "88". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
30		87	Cascieto	I	F		sister in law	S	Dec 25	1897	3
On line 30, the value for the otherRelationship field is "sister in law", the suggested correction is "Sister in law". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
31		88	Ball	Jos	M		Head	M	Feb 15	1849	52
On line 31, the value for the household field is "88", the suggested correction is "89". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
32		88	Ball	A	F		Wife	M	Apr 5	1861	40
On line 32, the value for the household field is "88", the suggested correction is "89". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
33		88	Ball	S	M		Son	S	Aug 25	1880	20
On line 33, the value for the household field is "88", the suggested correction is "89". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
34		89	Dixon	I	M		Head	M	Feb 4	1857	44
On line 34, the value for the household field is "89", the suggested correction is "90". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
35		89	Dixon	E	F		Wife	M	Dec 16	1861	39
On line 35, the value for the household field is "89", the suggested correction is "90". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
36		89	Dixon	G	F		Daughter	S	Dec 4	1880	20
On line 36, the value for the household field is "89", the suggested correction is "90". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
37		90	Hansard	E	M		Head	S	Apr 14	1865	36
On line 37, the value for the household field is "90", the suggested correction is "91". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
38		90	Kearney	M	F		roomer	M	Jul 12	1869	31
On line 38, the value for the otherRelationship field is "roomer", the suggested correction is "Roomer". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
38		90	Kearney	M	F		roomer	M	Jul 12	1869	31
On line 38, the value for the household field is "90", the suggested correction is "91". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
39		90	Kearney	G	M		roomer	S	Jun 14	1887	13
On line 39, the value for the otherRelationship field is "roomer", the suggested correction is "Roomer". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
39		90	Kearney	G	M		roomer	S	Jun 14	1887	13
On line 39, the value for the household field is "90", the suggested correction is "91". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
40		91	Poles	A. G.	M		Head	M	Sep 21	1865	35
On line 40, the value for the household field is "91", the suggested correction is "92". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
41		91	Poles	I.	F		Wife	M	Sep 28	1867	33
On line 41, the value for the household field is "91", the suggested correction is "92". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
42		91	Poles	G. A.	M		Son	S	Jan 9	1899	2
On line 42, the value for the household field is "91", the suggested correction is "92". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
43		91	Poles	Q. M	F		Daughter	S	Sep 3	1896	4
On line 43, the value for the household field is "91", the suggested correction is "92". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
43		91	Poles	Q. M	F		Daughter	S	Sep 3	1896	4
On line 43, the value for the givens field is "Q. M", the suggested correction is "O. M". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
44		91	Poles	G. F	F		Daughter	S	May 7	1894	6
On line 44, the value for the household field is "91", the suggested correction is "92". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
44		91	Poles	G. F	F		Daughter	S	May 7	1894	6
On line 44, the value for the surname field is "Poles", the suggested correction is "Coles". Submitted by Kevin Hanit. The following comment was attached: Make this correction after first correcting the household number for the Poles family to 92 from 91.
Field Value Correction Note
45		92	Dixon	Chas	M		Head	M	Jul 11	1871	29
On line 45, the value for the household field is "92", the suggested correction is "93". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
46		92	Dixon	K	F		Wife	M	Mar 19	1875	26
On line 46, the value for the household field is "92", the suggested correction is "93". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
47		92	Dixon	M	F		Daughter	S	Feb 9	1896	5
On line 47, the value for the household field is "92", the suggested correction is "93". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
48		92	Dixon	Wm	M		Son	S	Aug 15	1898	2
On line 48, the value for the household field is "92", the suggested correction is "93". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
49		92	Dixon	Geo	M		Son	S	Dec 11	1900	1/2
On line 49, the value for the household field is "92", the suggested correction is "93". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
50		92	Percy	F.	F		roomer	W	Aug 14	1853	47
On line 50, the value for the household field is "92", the suggested correction is "93". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.
Field Value Correction Note
50		92	Percy	F.	F		roomer	W	Aug 14	1853	47
On line 50, the value for the otherRelationship field is "roomer", the suggested correction is "Roomer". Submitted by Kevin Hanit.

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: a-24 District: TORONTO (Centre) (City/Cité) National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com