Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
@ next to the line number indicates contact information for someone researching this person, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description								Links
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		170	Clark Min?								01
2		170	Clark Ear?								01
3		171	Johnson Ja?								01
4		171	Johnson Mar?								01
5		171	Johnson Ann								01
6		171	Johnson Earl								01
7		172	O'Neil John
8		172	O'Neil Eliza?
9		172	O'Neil Reube?								01
10		173	Smith Wm.
11		173	Smith Lydia
12		173	Hartman Zyl?
@ 13		174	Rose Anson								01
14		174	Rose Marth?	M							01
15		174	Rose Sarah J.								01
16		174	Rose Jas. A. R.								01
17		175	Rose James
18		175	Rose Jane E.
19		176	Rose John ?	M
20		176	Rose Bertha
21		176	Rose Emetia S.
22		176	Switzer Mark
23		177	Bond Noble								01
24		177	Bond Lydia M.
25		177	Lowery Eliza J.
26		178	Rose Chas.								01
27		178	Rose Emma								01
28		178	Rose Stanley
29		178	Rose Lucinda
30		178	Bicknell Nathan								01
31		179	Sharpe Wm.								01
32		179	Sharpe Adda								01
33		179	Storms Edna
34		179	Storms Rose					Mar	1879	22
35		179	Sharpe Fred	M		Son	S	Dec 16	1891	10	01
36		180	Silver Robert	M		Head	M	Feb 23	1876	25	01
37		180	Silver Jane	F		Wife	M	Apr 20	1881	19	01
38		180	Silver Walter	M		Son	S	Sep 7	1899	1	01
39		180	Silver Eva M.	F		Daughter	S	Mar 25	1901	1/52	01
40		181	O'Neil Norman	M		Head	W	Jan 17	1859	42	01
41		181	O'Neil Charles	M		Son	S	Jan 17	1886	15	01
42		181	O'Neil Nellie	F		Daughter	S	Mar 20	1889	12
43		181	O'Neil Lulu	F		Daughter	S	Mar 28	1892	9	01
44		181	O'Neil Clayton	M		Son	S	Oct 26	1894	6	01
45		181	O'Neil Mary	F		Daughter	S	Sep 9	1897	3	01
46		181	Lemon Hattie	F		Domestic	S	Mar 23	1870	31	01
47		182	Wiseman Clayton	M		Head	M	Apr 6	1872	28	01
48		182	Wiseman Minnie	F		Wife	M	Feb 14	1871	30	01
49		182	Walbridge Mary	F		Adopted Daughter	S	Jan 15	1894	7	01
50		182	Sweet Ida A.	F		Domestic	S	Apr 7	1882	18

Line Notes On This Page

The following note applies to line 14:

'Maiden name is Martha Louise Baker'

The following note applies to line 18:

'Maiden name is Jane Elizabeth Stover'

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
12		173	Hartman	Zyl?
On line 12, the value for the givens field is "Zyl?", the suggested correction is "Zylpha". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: This is Zylpha or Zilpha Hartman
Field Value Correction Note
13		174	Rose	Anson
On line 13, the value for the relationship field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "Head".
Field Value Correction Note
13		174	Rose	Anson
On line 13, the value for the month field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "May".
Field Value Correction Note
13		174	Rose	Anson
On line 13, the value for the sex field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "M".
Field Value Correction Note
13		174	Rose	Anson
On line 13, the value for the year field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "1851".
Field Value Correction Note
13		174	Rose	Anson
On line 13, the value for the sex field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "M".
Field Value Correction Note
13		174	Rose	Anson
On line 13, the value for the day field is "0", the suggested correction is "27".
Field Value Correction Note
13		174	Rose	Anson
On line 13, the value for the maritalStatus field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "M".
Field Value Correction Note
14		174	Rose	Marth?	M
On line 14, the value for the year field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "1852".
Field Value Correction Note
14		174	Rose	Marth?	M
On line 14, the value for the maritalStatus field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "M".
Field Value Correction Note
14		174	Rose	Marth?	M
On line 14, the value for the sex field is "M", the suggested correction is "F".
Field Value Correction Note
14		174	Rose	Marth?	M
On line 14, the value for the relationship field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "Wife".
Field Value Correction Note
14		174	Rose	Marth?	M
On line 14, the value for the sex field is "M", the suggested correction is "F".
Field Value Correction Note
14		174	Rose	Marth?	M
On line 14, the value for the month field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "Sep".
Field Value Correction Note
14		174	Rose	Marth?	M
On line 14, the value for the givens field is "Marth?", the suggested correction is "Martha". The following comment was attached: Maiden name is Martha Louise Baker (was my great-great grandmother)
Field Value Correction Note
14		174	Rose	Marth?	M
On line 14, the value for the day field is "0", the suggested correction is "12".
Field Value Correction Note
15		174	Rose	Sarah J.
On line 15, the value for the givens field is "Sarah J.", the suggested correction is "Sarah Jane".
Field Value Correction Note
15		174	Rose	Sarah J.
On line 15, the value for the sex field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "F".
Field Value Correction Note
15		174	Rose	Sarah J.
On line 15, the value for the relationship field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "Daughter".
Field Value Correction Note
15		174	Rose	Sarah J.
On line 15, the value for the year field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "1875".
Field Value Correction Note
15		174	Rose	Sarah J.
On line 15, the value for the day field is "0", the suggested correction is "30".
Field Value Correction Note
15		174	Rose	Sarah J.
On line 15, the value for the month field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "Jan".
Field Value Correction Note
16		174	Rose	Jas. A. R.
On line 16, the value for the month field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "Mar".
Field Value Correction Note
16		174	Rose	Jas. A. R.
On line 16, the value for the relationship field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "Son".
Field Value Correction Note
16		174	Rose	Jas. A. R.
On line 16, the value for the day field is "0", the suggested correction is "29".
Field Value Correction Note
16		174	Rose	Jas. A. R.
On line 16, the value for the sex field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "M".
Field Value Correction Note
16		174	Rose	Jas. A. R.
On line 16, the value for the maritalStatus field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "S".
Field Value Correction Note
16		174	Rose	Jas. A. R.
On line 16, the value for the year field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "1891".
Field Value Correction Note
17		175	Rose	James
On line 17, the value for the maritalStatus field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "M".
Field Value Correction Note
17		175	Rose	James
On line 17, the value for the year field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "1818".
Field Value Correction Note
17		175	Rose	James
On line 17, the value for the relationship field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "Head".
Field Value Correction Note
17		175	Rose	James
On line 17, the value for the day field is "0", the suggested correction is "13".
Field Value Correction Note
17		175	Rose	James
On line 17, the value for the sex field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "M".
Field Value Correction Note
17		175	Rose	James
On line 17, the value for the month field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "Feb".
Field Value Correction Note
18		175	Rose	Jane E.
On line 18, the value for the relationship field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "Wife".
Field Value Correction Note
18		175	Rose	Jane E.
On line 18, the value for the sex field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "F".
Field Value Correction Note
18		175	Rose	Jane E.
On line 18, the value for the year field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "1821".
Field Value Correction Note
18		175	Rose	Jane E.
On line 18, the value for the maritalStatus field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "M".

Researcher contact information

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: d-5 District: Lennox National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com