Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
|
26 |
Dosbury Florance |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 27 |
1896 |
5
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
Dosbury Willie |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Mar 27 |
1899 |
2
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
Crowe Agnes |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Apr |
1849 |
51
|
|
|
01 |
|
27 |
Crowe Albert |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan |
1877 |
22
|
|
|
01 |
|
27 |
Crowe Margrett E. |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Apr 21 |
1879 |
20
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
Crowe Agnes? |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec |
1881 |
18
|
|
|
01 |
|
27 |
Crowe Irene |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
|
1883 |
16
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
Crowe Ida M |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar |
1889 |
12
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
Crowe Ellia W |
F |
|
Granddaughter |
S |
|
1896 |
5
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Rae James F |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Sep |
1859 |
40
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Rae Margrett |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Dec |
1857 |
43
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Rae Frank |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan |
1887 |
13
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Rae Ethal |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
|
1889 |
11
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
Rae Arther |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 2 |
1891 |
9
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
Munt Charles D |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jun 16 |
1846 |
55
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
Munt Christenia |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Dec 25 |
1838 |
63
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
Munt William A |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 28 |
1878 |
23
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
Munt Arthur H |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jul 28 |
1881 |
20
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
Defor Alfred H |
M |
|
Head |
M |
21 |
1842 |
49
|
|
|
01 |
|
30 |
Defor Sharlott |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jul 8 |
1849 |
42
|
|
|
01 |
|
30 |
Defor Hennry |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 4 |
1884 |
17
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
Defor Alfred |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 17 |
1887 |
14
|
|
|
01 |
|
30 |
Defor Lottie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Sep 7 |
1888 |
13
|
|
|
01 |
|
30 |
Defor Vanston |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 6 |
1894 |
7
|
|
|
01** |
|
30 |
Defor Elvenia |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jul 31 |
1895 |
6
|
|
|
01 |
|
31 |
Clingham Annie |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
? 28 |
1852 |
48
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
Clingham Herbert S |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan 16 |
1877 |
24
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
Clingham Bertha M |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 27 |
1880 |
21
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
Clingham George R |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun 16 |
1886 |
16
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
Clingham Mertal O |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Apr 13 |
1889 |
12
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
Clingham Jennie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Oct 27 |
1891 |
10
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
Clingham ?erson E |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 6 |
1897 |
4
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Marshel Charles |
M |
|
Head |
M |
May |
1861 |
40
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Marshel Agnes |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Oct 9 |
1860 |
41
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Marshel Elizabeth? |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Oct 21 |
1885 |
15
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Marshel Walter? |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 26 |
1888 |
12
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Marshel ? |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jul 9 |
1891 |
10
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Marshel ? |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan |
1892 |
9
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Marshel ? D |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Mar 7 |
1895 |
6
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
Marshel ????eth |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar |
1898 |
3
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
? William |
M |
|
Head |
M |
May 6 |
1841 |
60
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
? Elizabeth |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jan |
1847 |
53
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
? ? |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec |
1878 |
23
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
? ? |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun |
1883 |
18
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
? ? |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jul |
1889 |
12
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
Billing John F |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 5 |
1873 |
28
|
|
|
01 |
|
34 |
Billing Agnes? |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jun |
1878 |
23
|
|
|
01 |
|
34 |
Billing Elace? |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Oct |
1900 |
|
01 |
|
34 |
Lyons? Jane |
F |
|
Lodger |
S |
May 23 |
1878 |
23
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
Thomson Thomas |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Sep 21 |
1878 |
23
|
|
|
|
Surname Notes On This Page
In household 33, the enumerator wrote the surname as '?',
a suggested alternative surname is 'Auld'.
The person suggesting the alternative surname provided this comment: 'Wm Auld in 1901 city directory at this address'.
Field Correction Notes on this page
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a
proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If
the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line.
Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The
presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to
consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy
of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note |
1 |
|
26 |
Dosbury | Florance |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 27 |
1896 |
5 |
On line 1,
the value for the surname
field is "Dosburn",
the suggested correction is "Dasbury". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
46 |
|
34 |
Billing | John F |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 5 |
1873 |
28 |
On line 46,
the value for the surname
field is "Billing",
the suggested correction is "Billings". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: from 1911 census and marriage registration
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
47 |
|
34 |
Billing | Agnes? |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jun |
1878 |
23 |
On line 47,
the value for the otherDate
field is "0",
the suggested correction is "25?". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
47 |
|
34 |
Billing | Agnes? |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jun |
1878 |
23 |
On line 47,
the value for the surname
field is "Billing",
the suggested correction is "Billings". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: from 1911 census and marriage registration
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
47 |
|
34 |
Billing | Agnes? |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jun |
1878 |
23 |
On line 47,
the value for the givens
field is "Agnes?",
the suggested correction is "Annie". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: From various sources including 1911 census & marr registration
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
48 |
|
34 |
Billing | Elace? |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Oct |
1900 |
|
On line 48,
the value for the givens
field is "Elace?",
the suggested correction is "Elsie". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: Is Elsie on 1911 (center of S partially obscured
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
48 |
|
34 |
Billing | Elace? |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Oct |
1900 |
|
On line 48,
the value for the surname
field is "Billing",
the suggested correction is "Billings". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: from 1911 census
|
|
To register as a person researching someone on this page
click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: c-10
District: HAMILTON (City/Cité)
National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com