Field Value Correction Note |
2 |
|
14 |
Smith | Margaret J. |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Oct 29 |
1845 |
55 |
On line 2,
the value for the givens
field is "Margaret J.",
the suggested correction is "Margret J.". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: As it is written here.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
5 |
|
14 |
Gasling | William |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jan 20 |
1864 |
36 |
On line 5,
the value for the surname
field is "Gasling",
the suggested correction is "Girling".
The following comment was attached: MBVS Birth Reg.#1900-001869 for daughter Fanny.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
14 |
|
15 |
Graham | Albert |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 13 |
1884 |
16 |
On line 14,
the value for the givens
field is "Albert",
the suggested correction is "Albart". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: As it is written here.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
16 |
|
15 |
Graham | Margaret |
F |
|
Sister |
S |
Dec 28 |
1869 |
31 |
On line 16,
the value for the givens
field is "Margaret",
the suggested correction is "Margret". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
18 |
|
16 |
Ross | Isabela |
F |
|
Sister in Law |
S |
Oct 21 |
1850 |
50 |
On line 18,
the value for the givens
field is "Isabela",
the suggested correction is "Isebela". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: As it is written here.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
19 |
|
16 |
Murray | Isebela |
F |
|
Cousin |
S |
Oct 26 |
1852 |
48 |
On line 19,
the value for the day
field is "26",
the suggested correction is "20". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: It looks more like the zeros on the page than the sixes.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
19 |
|
16 |
Murray | Isebela |
F |
|
Cousin |
S |
Oct 26 |
1852 |
48 |
On line 19,
the value for the month
field is "Oct",
the suggested correction is "Nov". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
19 |
|
16 |
Murray | Isebela |
F |
|
Cousin |
S |
Oct 26 |
1852 |
48 |
On line 19,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "",
the suggested correction is "Cousin".
|
This correction was evaluated by Mark Gallop:
The suggested change has been made
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
20 |
|
16 |
Margaret | B.R. |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Sep 2 |
1879 |
21 |
On line 20,
the value for the givens
field is "B.R.",
the suggested correction is "Margaret B R". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
20 |
|
16 |
Margaret | B.R. |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Sep 2 |
1879 |
21 |
On line 20,
the value for the surname
field is "Margaret",
the suggested correction is "?". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: Surname is not given...could be Wilson, Ross or Murray.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
21 |
|
17 |
Dickie | Archibald |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jan 27 |
1856 |
44 |
On line 21,
the value for the givens
field is "Archibald",
the suggested correction is "Archibald H?". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: There is an initial there, also.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
22 |
|
17 |
Dickie | Sarah J. |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jun 20 |
1865 |
37 |
On line 22,
the value for the day
field is "20",
the suggested correction is "30". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: Compare to the twos and threes.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
24 |
|
17 |
Dickie | ?etty M. |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
May 1 |
1888 |
11 |
On line 24,
the value for the givens
field is "?etty M.",
the suggested correction is "Letty M.".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
26 |
|
17 |
Dickie | Francis |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 30 |
1894 |
7 |
On line 26,
the value for the year
field is "1894",
the suggested correction is "1893". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
32 |
|
18 |
Ross | Jenny |
F |
|
Niece |
S |
May 7 |
1892 |
8 |
On line 32,
the value for the givens
field is "Jenny",
the suggested correction is "Jennie". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
36 |
|
18 |
Duck??burg | Annie |
F |
|
Domestic |
S |
Jan 25 |
1872 |
28 |
On line 36,
the value for the surname
field is "Duck??burg",
the suggested correction is "Duckelbury?". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
46 |
|
21 |
Rumley | Patrick |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Mar 23 |
1846 |
55 |
On line 46,
the value for the givens
field is "Patrick",
the suggested correction is "Richard J". Submitted by Gail Gauthier.
The following comment was attached: Easier to see with a magnifying glass.
|
|