Field Value Correction Note |
12 |
|
2 |
B??nek? | Frank |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Sep 15 |
1875 |
26 |
On line 12,
the value for the surname
field is "B??nek?",
the suggested correction is "Piorunek".
The following comment was attached: The Polish Gen. Soc. of America, on their website, has identified PIORUNEK as a name known in the Barry's Bay area of Renfrew County. Also, this family is called Piorunek in Debbie Dagenais' rootsweb database.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
15 |
|
3 |
Biresenski(?) | Alex |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Mar 15 |
1849 |
52 |
On line 15,
the value for the surname
field is "Biresenski(?)",
the suggested correction is "Borczenski".
The following comment was attached: This family is in Debbie Dagenais' rootsweb database of Ottawa Valley Kashubs where the surname is spelled BORZCZINSKI.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
19 |
|
3 |
Biresenski(?) | K?aw??i |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jul 15 |
1895 |
6 |
On line 19,
the value for the givens
field is "K?aw??i",
the suggested correction is "Ksawesi?". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
20 |
|
3 |
Biresenski(?) | Agust? |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jul 12 |
1895 |
4 |
On line 20,
the value for the givens
field is "Agust?",
the suggested correction is "Agust". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
22 |
|
3 |
Biresenski(?) | Ketie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jul 4 |
1888 |
12 |
On line 22,
the value for the givens
field is "Ketie",
the suggested correction is "Letie". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
The following comment was attached: Writte differently from the strong Ks seen elsewhere.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
24 |
|
3 |
Biresenski(?) | Rosal?ya |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 7 |
1891 |
9 |
On line 24,
the value for the givens
field is "Rosal?ya",
the suggested correction is "Rosalyza?". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
26 |
|
4 |
Yothoski | Albert |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 22 |
1863 |
38 |
On line 26,
the value for the surname
field is "Yothoski",
the suggested correction is "Yolkoski".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
26 |
|
4 |
Yothoski | Albert |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 22 |
1863 |
38 |
On line 26,
the value for the surname
field is "Yothoski",
the suggested correction is "Yolkoski".
The following comment was attached: Albert Yolkowski was my GGG uncle, original spelling of name was prob Jolkowska. Albert married Elizabeth Olsheski.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
26 |
|
4 |
Yothoski | Albert |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 22 |
1863 |
38 |
On line 26,
the value for the surname
field is "Yothoski",
the suggested correction is "Yolhoski". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
26 |
|
4 |
Yothoski | Albert |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 22 |
1863 |
38 |
On line 26,
the value for the surname
field is "Yothoski",
the suggested correction is "Yolkoski".
The following comment was attached: According to info from Debbie Dagenais' rootsweb database, this person is buried St. Casimir Cem. at Round Lake, Renfrew Cty. The name on the record is Albert JOLKOWSKI
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
27 |
|
4 |
Yothoski | Elanabat(?) |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Nov 11 |
1866 |
34 |
On line 27,
the value for the givens
field is "Elanabat(?)",
the suggested correction is "Elesebet?".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
37 |
|
5 |
Baderski | Rosan(?) |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jul 12 |
1871 |
30 |
On line 37,
the value for the givens
field is "Rosan(?)",
the suggested correction is "Rozan".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
42 |
|
5 |
Baderski | Annae? |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 3 |
1893 |
8 |
On line 42,
the value for the givens
field is "Annae?",
the suggested correction is "Annie".
The following comment was attached: Appears to have been originally written Anna, then amended to Annie.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
43 |
|
5 |
Baderski | Kotie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 22 |
1899 |
2 |
On line 43,
the value for the givens
field is "Kotie",
the suggested correction is "Lotie". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
44 |
|
6 |
Mark | John |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jun 15 |
1848 |
53 |
On line 44,
the value for the surname
field is "Mark",
the suggested correction is "Mask?". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
The following comment was attached: Looks a lot like what has been interpreted as S in other places?
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
44 |
|
6 |
Mark | John |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jun 15 |
1848 |
53 |
On line 44,
the value for the surname
field is "Mark",
the suggested correction is "Mask".
The following comment was attached: This is John MASK (Maszk) m. 5 Feb 1877 at Brudenell, Renfrew County to Marianne Trzebinski. From church records, Our Lady of Angels, Brudenell.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
47 |
|
6 |
Mark | Erydor(?) |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 4 |
1876 |
21 |
On line 47,
the value for the givens
field is "Erydor(?)",
the suggested correction is "Ezydor". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
The following comment was attached: Is that second letter the way this enumerator writes some of his Zs? A version of "Isidore"?
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
47 |
|
6 |
Mark | Erydor(?) |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 4 |
1876 |
21 |
On line 47,
the value for the givens
field is "Erydor(?)",
the suggested correction is "Ezydor".
The following comment was attached: For Isidore.
|
|