Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		94	Chong Yow	M		Employee	S	Dec 7	1881	19
2		94	Wong Wa	M		Head	M	Sep 29	1868	32
3		94	Lee Foo	M		Employee	M	Aug 3	1855	45
4		94	Soy Fong	M		Employee	M	Jun 18	1864	36
5		94	Chen Ken	M		Employee	S	Oct 10	1875	25
6		95	Ma Quan	M		Head	M	Apr 23	1868	33
7		96	Wong Ark	M		Employee	M	Aug 15	1870	30
8		96	Ma Tsung	M		Lodger	S	Jun 7	1876	24
9		96	Ma Chung	M		Lodger	M	Aug 18	1867	33
10		96	Chung Yet	M		Lodger	M	Sep 9	1854	46
11		96	Mah Ark	M		Lodger	M	Apr 9	1846	55
12		97	Jong Sing Chen	M		Head	S	May 30	1866	34
13		97	Ching Chan Cho	M		Head	M	Jan 3	1854	47
14		97	Chin Tong You	M		Employee	S	Apr 6	1880	21
15		98	Wong W F	M		Head	S	Dec 14	1872	28
16		98	Wong W S	M		Employee	S	May 21	1876	24
17		98	Fung Jun	M		Employee	S	Mar 2	1885	16
18		98	Kei Wah	M		Employee	M	May 4	1878	22
19		98	Meo Wah	M		Employee	S	Jan 2	1871	30
20		98	Yei Sie	M		Employee	M	Aug 16	1874	26
21		98	Ah Low	M		Employee	S	Sep 12	1880	20
22		98	Ah Lei	M		Employee	S	Aug 8	1876	24
23		99	Ma Suie	M		Head	M	Feb 26	1854	47
24		99	N.g. Mock	M		Lodger	M	Oct 12	185?	48
25		99	Bow Chong	M		Lodger	M	Mar 20	1850	51
26		99	Wei Kay	M		Lodger	S	Apr 11	1852	49
27		99	Ah Gim	M		Lodger	M	Jun 15	1860	41
28		99	Fong Shong	M		Lodger	S	Apr 28	1876	25
29		99	Yung Fat	M		Lodger	S	Jul 15	1873	28
30		99	Lum Gee	M		Lodger	M	Feb 9	1848	53
31		99	Lum Chung	M			S	Sep 21	1873	28
32		99	Mah Quock	M			S	Dec 5	1875	26
33		99	Chow Ling	M			S	Oct 10	1876	25
34		99	Wing Chow	M			S	Jan 8	1861	40
35		100	Mar Chan	M		Head	M	Mar 4	1848	53
36		100	Mak Sue	M		Foreman	M	27	1862	39
37		100	Mah Luen	M		Employee	S	Jun 27	1877	23
38		100	Mar Chan See	F		Wife	M	Sep 26	1862	39
39		100	Mar Kei Khong	M		Son	S	Jul 7	1887	13
40		100	Ki Leong	M		Son	S	Nov 2	1899	1
41		100	Mar Sue See	F		Wife	M	Oct 11	1880	21
42		100	Sing Charlie	M			S	Jun 18	1858	43
43		100	Leo Chung	M		Head	M	Jan 6	1853	48
44		100	Leo Chung See	F		Wife	M	Feb 8	1863	38
45		101	Mah Churk	M		Head	M	May 5	1845	56
46		101	Mah Wei	M		Lodger	S	Aug 15	1887	14
47		101	Mah Tsoi	M		Lodger	S	May 5	1885	16
48		101	Mah Wing	M		Lodger	M	Feb 20	1866	35
49		101	Mah Dock	M		Lodger	S	Apr 8	1877	34
50		101	Low Sing	M		Lodger	S	Apr 12	1865	36

Surname Notes On This Page

In household 99, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'N.g.', a suggested alternative surname is 'Ng'.

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
15		98	Wong	W F	M		Head	S	Dec 14	1872	28
On line 15, the value for the surname field is "Wong", the suggested correction is "Woiry". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: I see an i,this is very different than the Wong below.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
15		98	Wong	W F	M		Head	S	Dec 14	1872	28
On line 15, the value for the surname field is "Wong", the suggested correction is "Woiry". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: I see an i,this is very different than the Wong below.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: Looks close enough to Wong which would be the most common name in this case
Field Value Correction Note
15		98	Wong	W F	M		Head	S	Dec 14	1872	28
On line 15, the value for the surname field is "Wong", the suggested correction is "Woiry". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: I see an i,this is very different than the Wong below.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: Looks close enough to Wong which would be the most common name in this case
Field Value Correction Note
15		98	Wong	W F	M		Head	S	Dec 14	1872	28
On line 15, the value for the surname field is "Wong", the suggested correction is "Woiry". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: I see an i,this is very different than the Wong below.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
24		99	N.g.	Mock	M		Lodger	M	Oct 12	185?	48
On line 24, the value for the year field is "1852", the suggested correction is "1853". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: This really looks like a 3, even though the math may say otherwise.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: I have checked the image of the original form and decided to make a change other than what the correction suggested. This comment was added: It could be a 3 or a 2. One number written over the other.
Field Value Correction Note
24		99	N.g.	Mock	M		Lodger	M	Oct 12	185?	48
On line 24, the value for the year field is "185?", the suggested correction is "1853".
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: Last digit could be a 3 or a 2
Field Value Correction Note
36		100	Mak	Sue	M		Foreman	M	27	1862	39
On line 36, the value for the day field is "1862", the suggested correction is "27 ?". Submitted anonymously.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: The suggested change has been made

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: d-7 District: VICTORIA National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com