Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description								Links
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		74	Madill Rhoda	F		Daughter	S	Sep 3	1889	11
2		74	Madill George	M		Son	S	Jan 28	1891	10
3		74	Madill Ann	F		Daughter	S	Oct 2	1892	8	01
4		74	Madill Hazel	M		Son	S	Aug 13	1894	6	01
5		74	Madill Henry	M		Son	S	Mar 12	1898	3
6		74	Madill Ernest	M		Son	S	Sep 8	1900		01
7		75	Shirk Peter	M		Head	M	Nov 16	1856	44
8		75	Shirk Susannah	F		Wife	M	Jan 1	1860	41
9		75	Shirk Edger	M		Son	S	Jul 1	1889	11
10		76	Barkey Samuel	M		Head	S	Feb 22	1840	61
11		76	Barkey Annie	F		Wife	M	Mar 25	1842	59
12		76	Barkey Barbery	F		Sister	S	Jul 18	1848	52
13		76	Smith Sophia	F		Daughter	S	Jan 25	1872	29
14		76	Ramen William	M		Domestic	S	Sep 20	1881	19
15		77	Wideman Wellington	M		Head	M	Apr 1	1865	35
16		77	Wideman Sarah	F		Wife	M	Mar	1871	30
17		77	Wideman Percy	M		Son	S	Oct 23	1892	8
18		77	Wideman Fern	F		Daughter	S	Oct 30	1899	1
19		78	Vanzant Sudack	M		Head	M	Aug 10	1844	56	01
20		78	Vanzant Martha	F		Wife	M	May 28	1844	56	01
21		79	Reesor Elias	M		Head	M	May 10	1851	49	01
22		79	Reesor Annie	F		Wife	M	Apr 25	1850	50	01
23		79	Reesor Nettie	F		Daughter	S	May 21	1878	22
24		79	Reesor William	M		Son	S	Apr 28	1875	25	01
25		80	Forsythe Edward	M		Head	M	Oct 17	1856	44	01
26		80	Forsythe Emma	F		Wife	M	Apr 23	1857	43	01
27		80	Forsythe William	M		Son	S	Mar 5	1879	22
28		80	Forsythe Lela	F		Daughter	S	May 18	1886	14
29		80	Forsythe Roy	M		Son	S	Feb 2	1890	11
30		80	Forsythe Winfred	F		Daughter	S	Jan 5	1893	8	01
31		81	Smales Thomas	M		Head	M	Jan 22	1847	54	01
32		81	Smales Mary	F		Wife	M	Dec 29	1850	50	01
33		81	Ramsey Gladys	F		Niece	S	Mar 31	1889	12	01
34		81	Curtis Robert	M		Head	W	Sep 24	1829	71	01
35		81	Curtis Alice	F		Daughter	S	Jan 6	1859	42	01
36		81	Curtis Ruth	F		Daughter	S	Aug 10	1874	26
37		81	King Murray	M		Grandson	S	Jan 14	1899	3	01
38		82	Degeer Kate	F		Head	S	May 8	1843	57
39		83	Ramsey Margaret	F		Head	M	Feb 19	1829	72
40		83	Ramsey Vincent	M		Son	S	Oct 28	1884	16	01
41		84	Doskey Samuel	M		Head	M	Oct 28	1857	43
42		84	Doskey Sharlet	F		Wife	M	Dec 6	1855	45
43		84	Doskey Earl	M		Son	S	Jun 6	1899	11
44		85	Cambel Henry	M		Head	M	Jul 6	1856	44
45		85	Cambel Nella	F		Wife	M	May 7	1872	28
46		85	Cambel Weslay	M		Son	S	Nov 29	1899	10
47		85	Cambel Frederick	M		Son	S	Aug 26	1894	6
48		85	Cambel Percy	M		Son	S	Oct 30	1896	4
49		85	Cambel Iris	F		Daughter	S	Oct 30	1898	2
50		86	Kindy Jacob	M		Head	M	Apr 17	1832	68	01

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
13		76	Smith	Sophia	F		Daughter	S	Jan 25	1872	29
On line 13, the value for the otherRelationship field is "Daughter", the suggested correction is "adopted". Submitted by Steve Marshall.
This correction was evaluated by Christie Williamson: The suggested change has been made
Field Value Correction Note
19		78	Vanzant	Sudack	M		Head	M	Aug 10	1844	56
On line 19, the value for the givens field is "Sadack", the suggested correction is "Ludwick". Submitted by Steve Marshall.
This correction was evaluated by Christie Williamson: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: The first letter of this name doesn't look like an L. It looks like the S for Single.
Field Value Correction Note
34		81	Curtis	Robert	M		Head	W	Sep 24	1829	71
On line 34, the value for the household field is "81", the suggested correction is "1081". The following comment was attached: added 1000 to create unique household number - please see transcription guidelines re correcting enumerator errors in HH #.
Field Value Correction Note
35		81	Curtis	Alice	F		Daughter	S	Jan 6	1859	42
On line 35, the value for the household field is "81", the suggested correction is "1081".
Field Value Correction Note
36		81	Curtis	Ruth	F		Daughter	S	Aug 10	1874	26
On line 36, the value for the household field is "81", the suggested correction is "1081".
Field Value Correction Note
37		81	King	Murray	M		Grandson	S	Jan 14	1899	3
On line 37, the value for the household field is "81", the suggested correction is "1081".
Field Value Correction Note
41		84	Doskey	Samuel	M		Head	M	Oct 28	1857	43
On line 41, the value for the surname field is "Doskey", the suggested correction is "Dorley?". Submitted by Steve Marshall.
This correction was evaluated by Christie Williamson: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
44		85	Cambel	Henry	M		Head	M	Jul 6	1856	44
On line 44, the value for the surname field is "Sannibel", the suggested correction is "Gambel". Submitted by Steve Marshall. The following comment was attached: or possibly Cambel (ie: Campbell)?
This correction was evaluated by Christie Williamson: A change other than the suggested correction has been made, I have checked the image of the original form and agree with the current value
Field Value Correction Note
44		85	Cambel	Henry	M		Head	M	Jul 6	1856	44
On line 44, the value for the surname field is "Sannibel", the suggested correction is "Gambel". Submitted by Steve Marshall. The following comment was attached: or possibly Cambel (ie: Campbell)?
This correction was evaluated by Christie Williamson: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
49		85	Cambel	Iris	F		Daughter	S	Oct 30	1898	2
On line 49, the value for the givens field is "Iris", the suggested correction is "Ida". Submitted anonymously.
This correction was evaluated by Christie Williamson: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
49		85	Cambel	Iris	F		Daughter	S	Oct 30	1898	2
On line 49, the value for the givens field is "Iris", the suggested correction is "Ida". Submitted by Steve Marshall.
This correction was evaluated by Christie Williamson: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: b-10 District: YORK (East/Est) National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com