Field Value Correction Note |
2 |
|
1 |
Pearson | Ellen |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Mar 10 |
1843 |
55 |
On line 2,
the value for the age
field is "55",
the suggested correction is "58". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
2 |
|
1 |
Pearson | Ellen |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Mar 10 |
1843 |
55 |
On line 2,
the value for the year
field is "1843",
the suggested correction is "1842". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
4 |
|
1 |
Neal | George |
M |
|
Servant |
S |
Mar 8 |
1879 |
21 |
On line 4,
the value for the month
field is "Mar",
the suggested correction is "May". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
14 |
|
5 |
Cunningham | William |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 5 |
1865 |
35 |
On line 14,
the value for the age
field is "35",
the suggested correction is "30". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
14 |
|
5 |
Cunningham | William |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 5 |
1865 |
35 |
On line 14,
the value for the year
field is "1865",
the suggested correction is "1860". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
18 |
|
6 |
Hope | Flora A |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Feb 24 |
186? |
3? |
On line 18,
the value for the givens
field is "Rosa? A",
the suggested correction is "Flora A,". Submitted anonymously.
|
This correction was evaluated by Lorna Madill:
The suggested change has been made
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
23 |
|
8 |
Chapman | Elsie |
F |
|
cousin |
S |
Jun 20 |
1875 |
26 |
On line 23,
the value for the age
field is "26",
the suggested correction is "22". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
23 |
|
8 |
Chapman | Elsie |
F |
|
cousin |
S |
Jun 20 |
1875 |
26 |
On line 23,
the value for the year
field is "1875",
the suggested correction is "1878". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
25 |
|
10 |
Malcolm | John |
M |
|
Head |
? |
Sep 8 |
1829 |
61 |
On line 25,
the value for the surname
field is "?",
the suggested correction is "Malachin".
|
This correction was evaluated by Lorna Madill:
I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
This comment was added: Migh be "Malcolm"
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
26 |
|
10 |
M? | Dan |
M |
|
Son |
? |
Sep |
|
|
On line 26,
the value for the surname
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Molochin".
|
This correction was evaluated by Lorna Madill:
I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
29 |
|
11 |
Scott | John |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jan |
|
47 |
On line 29,
the value for the year
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "1853".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
30 |
|
11 |
Scott | Drucilla(?) |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Dec 11 |
1841 |
39 |
On line 30,
the value for the givens
field is "Drucilla(?)",
the suggested correction is "Drucilla".
The following comment was attached: please see link to 1911
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
31 |
|
11 |
Scott | |
M |
|
? |
? |
Aug 17 |
1889 |
11 |
On line 31,
the value for the givens
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Emily E.".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
39 |
|
12 |
? | ? |
M |
|
Servant |
S |
Apr 3 |
1881 |
29 |
On line 39,
the value for the givens
field is "?",
the suggested correction is "Martin".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
40 |
|
13 |
Scott | William |
M |
|
Head |
S |
Jan |
|
|
On line 40,
the value for the age
field is "[?]",
the suggested correction is "55". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
40 |
|
13 |
Scott | William |
M |
|
Head |
S |
Jan |
|
|
On line 40,
the value for the year
field is "[?]",
the suggested correction is "1846". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
47 |
|
14 |
Seeley | J |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jul 7 |
|
32 |
On line 47,
the value for the givens
field is "J",
the suggested correction is "Alice". Submitted by Elizabeth Meade.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
48 |
|
14 |
Seeley | ? |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 8 |
1889 |
11 |
On line 48,
the value for the givens
field is "?",
the suggested correction is "Fred(?)".
The following comment was attached: please see link to 1911
|
|