Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
@ next to the line number indicates contact information for someone researching this person, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description								Links
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		1	Jaques John W.	M		Head	M	Feb 24	1834	67
2		1	Jaques Margaret A	F		Wife	M	May 16	1845	55	01
3		1	Jaques Elizabeth	F		Daughter	S	Jul 21	1866	34
4		1	Jaques Elsie B	F		Daughter	S	Oct 6	1879	20	01
5		1	Jaques John M	M		Son	S	Dec 31	1881	19
6		1	Jaques Ernest	M		Son	S	Jan 1	1884	17	01
7		1	Jaques Edgar W	M		Son	S	Jun 7	1885	15	01
8		1	Nay Georgina G	F		Niece	S	Apr 30	1896	4
9		2	Montgomery Andrew	M		Head	M	Sep 12	1842	59	01
10		2	Montgomery Isabella	F		Wife	M	Dec 25	1845	56	01
11		2	Montgomery Mary A	F		Daughter	S	Apr 28	1878	23	01
12		2	Montgomery Margret	F		Daughter	S	Nov 23	1879	21
13		2	Montgomery Wellington W	M		Son	S	Jul 22	1889	11
14		2	Rehkoph George	M		Servant	S	Mar 21	1875	26
15		3	Gregg George	M		Head	M	Sep 12	1836	64	01
16		3	Gregg Janet	F		Wife	M	Feb 22	1843	58	01
17		3	Scott Ella	F		Daughter	M	Dec 26	1864	36
18		3	Scott Miles	M		Son in Law	M	Aug 20	1869	31
19		3	Gregg Samuel G	M		Son	S	Oct 19	1878	22
20		3	Scott Eniz? E	F		Granddaughter	S	Nov 26	1897	3
21		4	Ortman John	M		Head	M	Oct 25	1856	44	01
22		4	Ortman Annie M D	F		Wife	M	Mar 10	1864	37	01
23		4	Ortman Annie M	F		Daughter	S	May 11	1885	15
24		4	Ortman Sophia D	F		Daughter	S	Aug 28	1886	14	01
25		4	Ortman Mary E	F		Daughter	S	Dec 12	1889	11	01
26		4	Ortman Matilda L	F		Daughter	S	Jul 19	1892	8	01
27		4	Ortman Fredrick	M		Father	W	Feb 14	1823	78
28		5	Munro Andrew J	M		Head	S	Apr 4	1878	22
29		5	Munro Margaret E	F		Sister	S	Jun 1	1868	32
30		5	Munro Ferlie J	M		Brother	S	Aug 10	1880	20
31		5	Munro Maud S E	F		Sister	S	Oct 13	1882	18
32		5	Reinheart Joseph	M		Servant	S	Oct 6	1880	20
33		6	Witmer Abraham	M		Head	M	Jan 21	1837	64
@ 34		6	Witmer Catherine	F		Wife	M	Dec 8	1860	40
35		6	Witmer Wilfred	M		Son	S	Nov 6	1882	18
@ 36		6	Kaechele Daniel H.	M		S. Son	S	Dec 25	1882	18	01
37		6	Kaechele Jacob W.	M		S. Son	S	Dec 5	1884	16
38		6	Kaechele Elizabeth M.	F		S. Daughter	S	Nov 7	1886	14
39		6	Witmer Margaret M	F		Daughter	S	Nov 4	1889	11
40		6	Witmer Catherine C	F		Daughter	S	Jul 13	1891	9
41		6	Witmer Edwin M	M		Son	S	Dec 12	1892	8
42		6	Witmer Charles W	M		Son	S	Feb 7	1894	7
43		6	Witmer Harvey H	M		Son	S	Jun 18	1898	2	01
44		7	Sangster Alex	M		Head	M	May 18	1840	60
45		7	Sangster Janet	F		Wife	M	Oct 23	1840	60	01
46		7	Sangster James	M		Son	S	Feb 20	1876	25	01
47		7	Sangster Thomas	M		Son	S	Jan 24	1881	20	01
48		7	Strachan Bessie	F		Adpt Daughter	S	Jun 17	1890	10
49		8	Sangster May	F		Sister	S	May 1	1844	56
50		8	Sangster Mary	F		Niece	S	Jun 23	1870	30

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
5		1	Jaques	John M	M		Son	S	Dec 31	1881	19
On line 5, the value for the givens field is "John M", the suggested correction is "John W". Submitted by Glen Johnson.
This correction was evaluated by Mark Gallop: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
36		6	Kaechele	Daniel H.	M		S. Son	S	Dec 25	1882	18
On line 36, the value for the relationship field is "S Son", the suggested correction is "Grandson". Submitted by Glen Johnson.
This correction was evaluated by Mark Gallop: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.

Researcher contact information

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: d-2 District: HURON (East/Est) National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com