Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
@ next to the line number indicates contact information for someone researching this person, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description								Links
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		178	Niblett William B	M		Head	M	Nov 29	1851	50
2		178	Niblett Harriott	F		Wife	M	Mar 20	1853	48
3		178	Niblett Charlotte	F		Daughter	S	Aug 18	1874	26
4		178	Arnold Mary E	F		Servant	S	Nov 22	1880	20
5		179	Dexter George O	M		Head	M	Jul 14	1865	36
6		179	Dexter Mary P	F		Wife	M	Jun 26	1872	29
7		179	Dexter George O	M		Son	S	Apr 10	1896	5
8		179	Crawford Etta	F		Servant	S	Nov 13	1874	26
9		180	Ly***** Sta?ton Victoria	F		Head	W	Oct 22	1838	62
10		180	Ly***** Charlotte	F		Daughter	S	Mar 8	1863	38
11		180	Ly***** Sarah	F		Daughter	S	Oct 24	1864	36
12		180	Ly***** Mark	M		Son	S	Feb 10	1876	24
13		180	Weadge (?) Mary	F		Servant	S	Aug 30	1879	21
14		181	Clarkson Henry W	M		Head	M	Nov 11	1861	39
15		181	Clarkson Jane	F		Wife	M	Sep 10	1864	36
16		182	Angus James	M		Head	M	Oct 29	1845	55
17		182	Angus Elizibeth	F		Wife	M	Mar 23	1849	52
18		182	Angus Emma	F		Daughter	S	Nov 3	1870	30
19		182	Henderson Agnes	F		Sister in law	S	Jun 26	1857	43
20		183	Dolloy Fe**** F	M		Head	M	May	1867	53
21		183	Dolloy Mabel	F		Wife	M	May 14	1854	46
22		183	Dolley Frederick F	M		Son	S	Apr	1883	17
23		183	Dolloy Marie M	F		Daughter	S	Jun	1885	16
24		183	Dolloy Julian N	M		Son	S	Nov	1891	9
25		183	Munson Elizibeth	F		Servant	M	Nov	1873	27
26		183	Forster William	M		Father in law	W	Nov	1825	75
27		184	Bruce Alexander	M		Head	M	Nov	1836	64
28		184	Bruce Agnes	F		Wife	M	Aug	1841	59
29		184	Bruce Ralph R	M		Son	S	Nov	1863	37
30		184	Bruce Bessie C	F		Daughter	S	Jul	1870	30
31		184	Thornton Sophie	F		Servant	S	Feb	1857	44
32		184	Edwards Maria	F		Servant	S	Feb	1856	45
33		184	Parkin Amanda	F		Servant	S	Dec	1863	37
34		185	Lucas Richard A	M		Head	M	Jul	1843	57
35		185	Lucas Agnes	F		Wife	M	Nov	1845	55
36		185	Lucas Constance E	F		Daughter	S	Feb	1874	27
37		185	Lucas Stanley B.	M		Son	S	Dec	1879	21	01
38		185	Lucas Travis	M		Son	S	Feb	1883	18
39		185	Parker Annie	F		Servant	S	Jul	1868	32
40		185	Gowitt Elizibeth	F		Servant	S	Jun	1875	25
41		185	Robinson Maud	F		Servant	S	Aug 8	1879	21
42		186	Hope George	M		Head	S	Oct	1846	54
43		186	Hope Robert K	M		Brother	W	Nov 5	1848	52
@ 44		186	Haddow Mary E	F		Servant	S	Feb	1879	22
45		187	Martin Kirwin	M		Head	M	Feb	1864	37
46		187	Martin Mabel	F		Wife	M	Jul	1870	30
47		187	Martin Edward A H	M		Son	S	Jun	1892	9
48		187	Martin Vera	F		Daughter	S	Mar 6	1893	8
49		187	Martin Crawford	M		Son	S	Dec	1894	6
50		187	Hollyoak Annie	F		Servant	S	Nov	1880	20

Surname Notes On This Page

In household 183, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Dolloy', a suggested alternative surname is 'Dalley'.

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
1		178	Niblett	William B	M		Head	M	Nov 29	1851	50
On line 1, the value for the givens field is "William B", the suggested correction is "William C.".
This correction was evaluated by Dolores Massie: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
9		180	Ly*****	Sta?ton Victoria	F		Head	W	Oct 22	1838	62
On line 9, the value for the givens field is "Sta?ton Victoria", the suggested correction is "Victoria". Submitted anonymously.
Field Value Correction Note
9		180	Ly*****	Sta?ton Victoria	F		Head	W	Oct 22	1838	62
On line 9, the value for the surname field is "Ly*****", the suggested correction is "Lynn(?)".
This correction was evaluated by Dolores Massie: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
9		180	Ly*****	Sta?ton Victoria	F		Head	W	Oct 22	1838	62
On line 9, the value for the surname field is "Ly*****", the suggested correction is "Lynch". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: This family is usually listed as Lynch-Staunton.
Field Value Correction Note
9		180	Ly*****	Sta?ton Victoria	F		Head	W	Oct 22	1838	62
On line 9, the value for the givens field is "Sta?ton Victoria", the suggested correction is "Staunton Victoria". Submitted anonymously.
Field Value Correction Note
9		180	Ly*****	Sta?ton Victoria	F		Head	W	Oct 22	1838	62
On line 9, the value for the surname field is "Ly*****", the suggested correction is "Lyne". The following comment was attached: or Lynel, or Lyssel?
Field Value Correction Note
9		180	Ly*****	Sta?ton Victoria	F		Head	W	Oct 22	1838	62
On line 9, the value for the surname field is "Ly*****", the suggested correction is "lynch". Submitted anonymously.
Field Value Correction Note
9		180	Ly*****	Sta?ton Victoria	F		Head	W	Oct 22	1838	62
On line 9, the value for the surname field is "Ly*****", the suggested correction is "Lynch-Staunton". Submitted anonymously.
Field Value Correction Note
9		180	Ly*****	Sta?ton Victoria	F		Head	W	Oct 22	1838	62
On line 9, the value for the givens field is "Sta?ton Victoria", the suggested correction is "Staunton Victoria".
Field Value Correction Note
10		180	Ly*****	Charlotte	F		Daughter	S	Mar 8	1863	38
On line 10, the value for the surname field is "Ly*****", the suggested correction is "Lynch-Staunton". Submitted anonymously.
Field Value Correction Note
11		180	Ly*****	Sarah	F		Daughter	S	Oct 24	1864	36
On line 11, the value for the surname field is "Ly*****", the suggested correction is "Lynch-Staunton". Submitted anonymously.
Field Value Correction Note
12		180	Ly*****	Mark	M		Son	S	Feb 10	1876	24
On line 12, the value for the surname field is "Ly*****", the suggested correction is "Lynch-Staunton". Submitted anonymously.
Field Value Correction Note
13		180	Weadge (?)	Mary	F		Servant	S	Aug 30	1879	21
On line 13, the value for the surname field is "Weadge (?)", the suggested correction is "Weadge". The following comment was attached: Proofreader agrees surname
Field Value Correction Note
20		183	Dolloy	Fe**** F	M		Head	M	May	1867	53
On line 20, the value for the givens field is "Fe**** F", the suggested correction is "Fenner F".
Field Value Correction Note
20		183	Dolloy	Fe**** F	M		Head	M	May	1867	53
On line 20, the value for the year field is "1867", the suggested correction is "1847".
Field Value Correction Note
20		183	Dolloy	Fe**** F	M		Head	M	May	1867	53
On line 20, the value for the givens field is "Fe**** F", the suggested correction is "Fenner F". The following comment was attached: At least looks like 'Fenner' to me. Turns out there's like 7 IGI's on the LDS site for this guy (using surname Dalley).
Field Value Correction Note
20		183	Dolloy	Fe**** F	M		Head	M	May	1867	53
On line 20, the value for the surname field is "Dolloy", the suggested correction is "Dalley". The following comment was attached: At least, that's what it looks like to me.
Field Value Correction Note
20		183	Dolloy	Fe**** F	M		Head	M	May	1867	53
On line 20, the value for the otherDate field is "0", the suggested correction is "?1". The following comment was attached: The '1' part is clear, but can't tell if it's 11 or 21.
Field Value Correction Note
22		183	Dolley	Frederick F	M		Son	S	Apr	1883	17
On line 22, the value for the otherDate field is "0", the suggested correction is "?1". The following comment was attached: The '1' part is clear, but can't tell if it's 11 or 21, or 1 for that matter.
Field Value Correction Note
26		183	Forster	William	M		Father in law	W	Nov	1825	75
On line 26, the value for the otherDate field is "0", the suggested correction is "?2".
Field Value Correction Note
26		183	Forster	William	M		Father in law	W	Nov	1825	75
On line 26, the value for the givens field is "William", the suggested correction is "William C.".
Field Value Correction Note
27		184	Bruce	Alexander	M		Head	M	Nov	1836	64
On line 27, the value for the day field is "0", the suggested correction is "23".
Field Value Correction Note
28		184	Bruce	Agnes	F		Wife	M	Aug	1841	59
On line 28, the value for the otherDate field is "0", the suggested correction is "?6".

Researcher contact information

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: b-6 District: HAMILTON (City/Cité) National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com