Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
|
39 |
McLaughlin Hugh |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Mar 20 |
1872 |
29
|
|
|
01 |
|
39 |
McLaughlin Lavina |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
May 12 |
1880 |
20
|
|
|
01 |
|
39 |
McLaughlin James |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Mar 20 |
1900 |
1
|
|
|
01 |
|
40 |
Eady William |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 15 |
1863 |
37
|
|
|
01 |
|
40 |
Eady Lydie |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Apr 7 |
1863 |
37
|
|
|
01 |
|
40 |
Eady Lisabith |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 31 |
1887 |
14
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
Eady Lillie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 11 |
1889 |
11
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
Eady David |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan 7 |
1891 |
10
|
|
|
01 |
|
40 |
Eady Reeves |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Sep 27 |
1892 |
8
|
|
|
01 |
|
40 |
Eady Sarah |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jul 24 |
1894 |
6
|
|
|
01 |
|
40 |
Eady Fannie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
May 20 |
1898 |
2
|
|
|
01 |
|
41 |
Sutliff Margar |
F |
|
Head |
W |
Mar 12 |
1865 |
56
|
|
|
01 |
|
41 |
Sutliff Thomas |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jul 8 |
1876 |
24
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
Sutliff Edward |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Sep 8 |
1877 |
23
|
|
|
01 |
|
42 |
Sutliff Lizzie |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Feb 4 |
1878 |
23
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
Sutliff Lillian |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Apr 15 |
1900 |
11/12
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
Sutleff Peter |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Dec 25 |
1870 |
30
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
Sutleff Mary |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
May 12 |
1873 |
27
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
Sutleff John |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan 11 |
1894 |
7
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
Sutleff Mary |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jun 10 |
1896 |
4
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
Sutleff Margaret |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Aug 13 |
1898 |
2
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
Sutleff May |
F |
|
Mother |
W |
Apr 12 |
1850 |
50
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
Sutleff James |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Oct 20 |
1862 |
38
|
|
|
01 |
|
44 |
Sutleff Margaret |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
May 27 |
1860 |
40
|
|
|
01 |
|
44 |
Sutleff Nellie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Oct 26 |
1887 |
14
|
|
|
01 |
|
44 |
Sutleff James |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 2 |
1891 |
9
|
|
|
01 |
|
44 |
Sutleff Clara |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Feb 3 |
1895 |
6
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
Neville Tomas |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Feb 24 |
1866 |
35
|
|
|
01 |
|
45 |
Neville Cathrine |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Mar 5 |
1872 |
29
|
|
|
01 |
|
45 |
Neville Frank |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 31 |
1893 |
7
|
|
|
01 |
|
45 |
Neville Joseph |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun 13 |
1897 |
3
|
|
|
01 |
|
45 |
Neville Mary |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Aug 10 |
1900 |
8/12
|
|
|
01 |
|
45 |
Shae Florence |
F |
|
Servant |
S |
Oct 3 |
1885 |
15
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
McLaughlin James |
M |
|
Head |
M |
May 12 |
1830 |
70
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
McLaughlin Jenie |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Mar 3 |
1852 |
49
|
|
|
01 |
|
46 |
McLaughlin John |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jul 16 |
1872 |
28
|
|
|
01 |
|
46 |
McLaughlin Effie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jul 31 |
1886 |
14
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
McLaughlin Mary |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jul 26 |
1888 |
12
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
McLaughlin David |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun 3 |
1890 |
10
|
|
|
01 |
|
46 |
McLaughlin George |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jul 31 |
1894 |
6
|
|
|
01 |
|
47 |
McLaughlin William |
M |
|
Head |
M |
May 13 |
1870 |
30
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
McLaughlin Lydia |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Aug 27 |
1877 |
24
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
McLaughlin Martha |
F |
|
Sister |
S |
Sep 29 |
1884 |
16
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
McLaughlin Martha |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun 19 |
1899 |
1
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
McLaughlin Hugh |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Sep 7 |
1900 |
7/12
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
Gorman Michael |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 10 |
1842 |
58
|
|
|
01 |
|
48 |
Gorman Catherine |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
May 12 |
1855 |
45
|
|
|
01 |
|
48 |
Gorman Mary |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 28 |
1877 |
23
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
Gorman Joseph |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Oct 6 |
1883 |
17
|
|
|
01 |
|
48 |
Gorman William |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun 28 |
1885 |
15
|
|
|
01 |
Line Notes On This Page
The following note applies to line 44:
'Could this be a daughter rather than a son?' |
The following note applies to line 44:
'Apparently "Martha" was a daughter rather than a son. Sounds logical.' |
The following note applies to line 44:
'Should be "daughter", I would think.' |
Field Correction Notes on this page
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a
proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If
the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line.
Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The
presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to
consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy
of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note |
12 |
|
41 |
Sutliff | Margar |
F |
|
Head |
W |
Mar 12 |
1865 |
56 |
On line 12,
the value for the year
field is "1865",
the suggested correction is "1845". Submitted by David Ireton.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
44 |
|
47 |
McLaughlin | Martha |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun 19 |
1899 |
1 |
On line 44,
the value for the relationship
field is "Son",
the suggested correction is "Daughter". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: Martha wa a daughter
|
This correction was evaluated by Bill Lavery:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
|
|
To register as a person researching someone on this page
click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: i-3
District: RENFREW (North/Nord)
National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com