Site Home Linking Message Boards Help | Automated Genealogy | Census Indices: 1901 1906 1911 1852CA 1851NB |
|
Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
L i n e # |
Numbered in order of visitation | Personal Description | Links | ||||||||||
H o u s e |
Family or House- hold |
Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901. | Sex. | C o l o u r |
Relationship to head of family or household. |
Single, married, widowed or divorced. |
Month and date of birth. | Year of birth. | Age at last birthday. | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 60 | Hauley Cristeen | F | Wife | M | Oct 6 | 1869 |
|
|||||
2 | 60 | Hauley Coolman | M | Uncle | W | Apr 19 | 1825 |
|
|||||
3 | 61 | Miller Frances | M | Head | M | Dec 23 | 1824 |
|
|||||
4 | 61 | Miller Margrate | F | Wife | M | Sep 15 | 1840 |
|
|||||
5 | 62 | Bishop Hugh | M | Head | M | Jun 6 | 1871 |
|
01 | ||||
6 | 62 | Bishop Margrate | F | Wife | M | Jun 10 | 1877 |
|
01 | ||||
7 | 62 | Bishop George | M | Father | W | Mar 1 | 1836 |
|
|||||
8 | 63 | Craigan Michael | M | Head | M | Jan 29 | 1875 |
|
|||||
9 | 63 | Craigan Anny M | F | Wife | M | Nov 26 | 1875 |
|
|||||
10 | 63 | Craigan Patrick L | M | Son | S | Feb 20 | 1899 |
|
|||||
11 | 64 | Nolan Edward | M | Head | M | Oct 16 | 1861 |
|
01 | ||||
12 | 64 | Nolan Margret I | F | Wife | M | Feb 13 | 1862 |
|
01 | ||||
13 | 64 | Nolan John P | M | Son | S | Dec 19 | 1893 |
|
01 | ||||
14 | 64 | Nolan Anne S | F | Daughter | S | Apr 10 | 1895 |
|
01 | ||||
15 | 64 | Nolan Ida E | F | Daughter | S | Jul 7 | 1896 |
|
01 | ||||
16 | 64 | Nolan Edward J | M | Son | S | Dec 1 | 1898 |
|
01 | ||||
17 | 64 | Nolan Philip L | M | Son | S | Apr 30 | 1900 |
|
01 | ||||
18 | 65 | Story Thomas Jr | M | Head | M | Oct 16 | 1867 |
|
01 | ||||
19 | 65 | Story Agusta S | F | Wife | M | Dec 10 | 1862 |
|
01 | ||||
20 | 65 | Story Charles L | M | Son | S | Feb 24 | 1889 |
|
01 | ||||
21 | 65 | Story Perel (?) | F | Daughter | S | Oct 16 | 1892 |
|
|||||
22 | 66 | Levere Allen | M | Head | M | Nov 15 | 1842 |
|
|||||
23 | 66 | Levere Irye??ny | F | Wife | M | Sep 19 | 1850 |
|
|||||
24 | 66 | Levere Pearl L | F | Daughter | S | Jun 6 | 1888 |
|
|||||
25 | 67 | Roy George H | M | Head | M | Mar 17 | 1857 |
|
01 | ||||
26 | 67 | Roy Agnes | F | Wife | M | Sep 1 | 1872 |
|
01 | ||||
27 | 67 | Roy Eldon S | M | Son | S | Mar 11 | 1883 |
|
01 | ||||
28 | 67 | Roy Agnes B | F | Daughter | S | Jul 7 | 1891 |
|
01 | ||||
29 | 67 | Roy George H | M | Son | S | Apr 29 | 1894 |
|
01 | ||||
30 | 67 | Roy Robert A | M | Son | S | May 21 | 1896 |
|
01 | ||||
31 | 67 | Roy Astalla J | F | Daughter | S | Jun 21 | 1898 |
|
01 | ||||
32 | 67 | Roy Thomas J | M | Son | S | Apr 30 | 1900 |
|
01 | ||||
33 | 68 | Vance William H | M | Head | M | Aug 5 | 1850 |
|
01 | ||||
34 | 68 | Vance Isibella | F | Wife | M | Aug 11 | 1840 |
|
01 | ||||
35 | 68 | Vance William H | M | Son | S | Aug 21 | 1887 |
|
01 | ||||
36 | 68 | Vance Thomas S | M | Son | S | Sep 23 | 1890 |
|
01 | ||||
37 | 68 | Vance Lizzie M | F | Daughter | S | Jan 26 | 1891 |
|
011 | ||||
38 | 68 | Vance James L | M | Son | S | Aug 13 | 1893 |
|
01 | ||||
39 | 68 | Vance Sheila | F | Daughter | S | Mar 7 | 1895 |
|
011 | ||||
40 | 68 | Vance Edna J | F | Daughter | S | Sep 17 | 1900 |
|
01 | ||||
41 | 69 | Lacey Robert I | M | Head | M | Apr 8 | 1860 |
|
01 | ||||
42 | 69 | Lacey Violet J | F | Wife | M | Sep 8 | 1860 |
|
01 | ||||
43 | 69 | Lacey Albert | M | Son | S | Apr 24 | 1884 |
|
|||||
44 | 69 | Lacey Frances E | M | Son | S | Jan | 1886 |
|
01 | ||||
45 | 69 | Lacey William J | M | Son | S | Jan 16 | 1880 |
|
01 | ||||
46 | 69 | Lacey James Hq | M | Son | S | Mar 30 | 1893 |
|
011 | ||||
47 | 69 | Lacey Anne E | F | Daughter | S | Apr 14 | 1895 |
|
01 | ||||
48 | 69 | Lacey George A | M | Son | S | Dec 30 | 1899 |
|
01 | ||||
49 | 70 | Kennelly Jeremiah | M | Head | M | Feb 15 | 1854 |
|
01 | ||||
50 | 70 | Kennelly Margrate | F | Wife | M | Nov 25 | 1858 |
|
01 |
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
1 | 60 | Hauley | Cristeen | F | Wife | M | Oct 6 | 1869 | 31 | ||
On line 1,
the value for the givens
field is "Christine",
the suggested correction is "Christien". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
8 | 63 | Craigan | Michael | M | Head | M | Jan 29 | 1875 | 26 | ||
On line 8,
the value for the givens
field is "Michael",
the suggested correction is "Micheal". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
12 | 64 | Nolan | Margret I | F | Wife | M | Feb 13 | 1862 | 39 | ||
On line 12,
the value for the givens
field is "Margret I",
the suggested correction is "Margret T". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. The following comment was attached: If you look at the I in Ida, Its not the same as here. That's why i think its a T. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
16 | 64 | Nolan | Edward J | M | Son | S | Dec 1 | 1898 | 3 | ||
On line 16,
the value for the year
field is "1898",
the suggested correction is "1897". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
21 | 65 | Story | Perel (?) | F | Daughter | S | Oct 16 | 1892 | 8 | ||
On line 21,
the value for the givens
field is "Perel (?)",
the suggested correction is "Perel". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
22 | 66 | Levere | Allen | M | Head | M | Nov 15 | 1842 | 58 | ||
On line 22,
the value for the surname
field is "Le?ea?",
the suggested correction is "Lerear". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
23 | 66 | Levere | Irye??ny | F | Wife | M | Sep 19 | 1850 | 50 | ||
On line 23,
the value for the givens
field is "Irye??ny",
the suggested correction is "Tryefeeny". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
38 | 68 | Vance | James L | M | Son | S | Aug 13 | 1893 | 7 | ||
On line 38,
the value for the givens
field is "James L",
the suggested correction is "Jame L". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
39 | 68 | Vance | Sheila | F | Daughter | S | Mar 7 | 1895 | 5 | ||
On line 39,
the value for the givens
field is "Sheila",
the suggested correction is "Luila".
The following comment was attached: "Luella" 1911 | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
39 | 68 | Vance | Sheila | F | Daughter | S | Mar 7 | 1895 | 5 | ||
On line 39,
the value for the givens
field is "Sheila",
the suggested correction is "Louila". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
39 | 68 | Vance | Sheila | F | Daughter | S | Mar 7 | 1895 | 5 | ||
On line 39,
the value for the givens
field is "Sheila",
the suggested correction is "a". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
39 | 68 | Vance | Sheila | F | Daughter | S | Mar 7 | 1895 | 5 | ||
On line 39,
the value for the givens
field is "Sheila",
the suggested correction is ":oula". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
41 | 69 | Lacey | Robert I | M | Head | M | Apr 8 | 1860 | 40 | ||
On line 41,
the value for the givens
field is "Robert I",
the suggested correction is "Robert T". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
43 | 69 | Lacey | Albert | M | Son | S | Apr 24 | 1884 | 16 | ||
On line 43,
the value for the givens
field is "Albert",
the suggested correction is "Albrt". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
44 | 69 | Lacey | Frances E | M | Son | S | Jan | 1886 | 15 | ||
On line 44,
the value for the day
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "28". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
46 | 69 | Lacey | James Hq | M | Son | S | Mar 30 | 1893 | 8 | ||
On line 46,
the value for the givens
field is "James Hq",
the suggested correction is "James H". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
50 | 70 | Kennelly | Margrate | F | Wife | M | Nov 25 | 1858 | 42 | ||
On line 50,
the value for the maritalStatus
field is "M",
the suggested correction is "?". Submitted by Eileen LaBonte. The following comment was attached: It actually says F, not M for married. | |||||||||||
To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: b District: ADDINGTON National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com