Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
|
68 |
Hollingsworth Nicholas |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Mar 5 |
1842 |
59
|
|
|
01 |
|
68 |
Hollingsworth Mary |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
May 19 |
1855 |
45
|
|
|
01 |
|
68 |
Hollingsworth Nicholas J. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 16 |
1880 |
21
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
Hollingsworth Alice R. |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
May 30 |
1878 |
22
|
|
|
01 |
|
68 |
Hollingsworth J. David J. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 15 |
1885 |
15
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
Hollingsworth Frerick J. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 6 |
1888 |
12
|
|
|
01 |
|
69 |
Topping John |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Sep 30 |
1853 |
47
|
|
|
01 |
|
69 |
Topping Sarah |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Apr 4 |
1855 |
46
|
|
|
01 |
|
69 |
Topping George |
M |
|
Father |
W |
Jan 10 |
1822 |
79
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
Darling Wallace K. |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jan 5 |
1879 |
22
|
|
|
01 |
|
70 |
Darling Tenith L. |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Sep 5 |
1882 |
18
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
Darling Hazael M |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Sep 23 |
1900 |
7/12
|
|
|
01 |
|
71 |
Hamblen Melvin |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 18 |
1872 |
29
|
|
|
01 |
|
71 |
Hamblen Georgie |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jun 9 |
1877 |
23
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
Hamblen Raymond W |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jul 8 |
1900 |
9/12
|
|
|
01 |
|
71 |
Forrest Jessie |
F |
|
Domestic |
S |
Jun 3 |
1882 |
18
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
Hayes Fred S. |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jul 5 |
1860 |
40
|
|
|
01 |
|
71 |
Hayes Mary L. |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Dec 1 |
1859 |
41
|
|
|
01 |
|
71 |
Hayes Hayden H. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Sep 2 |
1891 |
9
|
|
|
01 |
|
71 |
Hayes Douglas |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 8 |
1895 |
6
|
|
|
011 |
|
73 |
Bolton Delbert |
M |
|
Head |
W |
May 14 |
1863 |
37
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
Livingston Adalaid |
F |
|
Head |
M |
May 28 |
1860 |
40
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
Schofield Milton S. |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Sep 6 |
1871 |
29
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
Schofield Ellen L. |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jun 1 |
1874 |
26
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
Schofield George L. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 25 |
1894 |
6
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
Schofield Roy C. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 10 |
1896 |
4
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
Schofield Ford E |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Oct 9 |
1899 |
1
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
Pearce Wm. H. |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Mar 2 |
1839 |
60
|
|
|
01 |
|
76 |
Pearce Lovica |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Oct 24 |
1848 |
52
|
|
|
01 |
|
76 |
Pearce Mary |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 23 |
1871 |
29
|
|
|
01 |
|
76 |
Pearce Herbert A. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 8 |
1881 |
20
|
|
|
01 |
|
77 |
Freeman Abner |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Sep 18 |
1864 |
36
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
Freeman Kittie B |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jun 17 |
1868 |
32
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
Freeman Wm. S. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 27 |
1893 |
7
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
Freeman Olive N. |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Nov 6 |
1896 |
4
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
Freeman Frank B. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun 22 |
1900 |
10/12
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
Parish Joel |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 2 |
1846 |
55
|
|
|
01 |
|
78 |
Parish Harriet |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Mar 4 |
1852 |
49
|
|
|
01 |
|
78 |
Thompson David |
M |
|
Domestic |
S |
Mar 16 |
1883 |
18
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
Tanner Edwd |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 17 |
1856 |
45
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
Tanner Emma |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jan 19 |
1863 |
38
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
Tanner Katie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 27 |
1886 |
15
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
Tanner Joseph C. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan 16 |
1888 |
13
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
Tanner Frederick |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 21 |
1889 |
11
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
Tanner Martha A. |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Feb 10 |
1892 |
9
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
Tanner Victoria J. |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Dec 24 |
1898 |
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line Notes On This Page
The following note applies to line 11:
'Proofreader indicates Tenith Lettia.' |
Field Correction Notes on this page
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a
proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If
the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line.
Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The
presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to
consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy
of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note |
11 |
|
70 |
Darling | Tenith L. |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Sep 5 |
1882 |
18 |
On line 11,
the value for the givens
field is "Tonith?",
the suggested correction is "Tenith Lettia". Submitted anonymously.
|
This correction was evaluated by Geoffrey Wyght:
A change other than the suggested correction has been made, I have checked the image of the original form and agree with the current value
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
25 |
|
75 |
Schofield | George L. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 25 |
1894 |
6 |
On line 25,
the value for the day
field is "25",
the suggested correction is "23". Submitted by Shelley.
|
This correction was evaluated by Geoffrey Wyght:
I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
|
|
To register as a person researching someone on this page
click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: j-3
District: LEEDS (South/Sud)
National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com