Field Value Correction Note |
4 |
|
1 |
Presley | Frederic C. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 16 |
1883 |
16 |
On line 4,
the value for the year
field is "1883",
the suggested correction is "1885". Submitted by Carol Foisy.
|
This correction was evaluated by Vinzenz Lübben:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
10 |
|
2 |
Viau | Felorida |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Feb 28 |
1876 |
24 |
On line 10,
the value for the givens
field is "Telorida",
the suggested correction is "Florida". Submitted by Carol Foisy.
|
This correction was evaluated by Vinzenz Lübben:
I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
14 |
|
3 |
Reschon | Clophas |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Dec 28 |
1851 |
49 |
On line 14,
the value for the surname
field is "Reschon",
the suggested correction is "Rochon". Submitted by Carol Foisy.
The following comment was attached: This enumerator's handwriting often shows a curly ending on capitalized R's.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
19 |
|
5 |
Gendon | M. Louise |
F |
|
Domestic |
S |
Nov 28 |
1874 |
26 |
On line 19,
the value for the surname
field is "Gendon",
the suggested correction is "Guindon". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
22 |
|
6 |
Perron | Arsèdas |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Sep 10 |
1896 |
4 |
On line 22,
the value for the lineNo
field is "22",
the suggested correction is "". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: Danis Alcidas Sep 16 1896
|
This correction was evaluated by Vinzenz Lübben:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
23 |
|
6 |
Deguire | Louise |
F |
|
Wife |
? |
Feb 25 |
1843 |
57 |
On line 23,
the value for the maritalStatus
field is "M",
the suggested correction is "W". Submitted by Carol Foisy.
|
This correction was evaluated by Vinzenz Lübben:
I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
This comment was added: The correct value is unclear, but can be "M" only, since column 6 has "Epouse" (Wife).
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
33 |
|
7 |
Perron | Felorida |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Feb 13 |
1893 |
7 |
On line 33,
the value for the givens
field is "Felorida",
the suggested correction is "Florida". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
36 |
|
7 |
Perron | Osila |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 28 |
1900 |
1 |
On line 36,
the value for the givens
field is "Osila",
the suggested correction is "Ovila". Submitted by Carol Foisy.
The following comment was attached: According to Claude Lemay's rootsweb family tree, this is Ovila Oscar Perron b. 18 Aug 1899 at Clarence Creek. http://wc.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=:1157363&id=I14747
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
36 |
|
7 |
Perron | Osila |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 28 |
1900 |
1 |
On line 36,
the value for the givens
field is "Osila",
the suggested correction is "Ovila".
The following comment was attached: I also see Ovila.It does not look exactly like line 35
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
36 |
|
7 |
Perron | Osila |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 28 |
1900 |
1 |
On line 36,
the value for the givens
field is "Osila",
the suggested correction is "Ovila". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
36 |
|
7 |
Perron | Osila |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 28 |
1900 |
1 |
On line 36,
the value for the givens
field is "Osila",
the suggested correction is "Ovila". Submitted by Carol Foisy.
The following comment was attached: Vin. This actually IS Ovila Oscar Perron, son of Emery Perron and Délia Laviolette. The name in the image could easily be read as Ovila.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
37 |
|
8 |
Dentor | Joseph |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jul 29 |
1860 |
40 |
On line 37,
the value for the surname
field is "Dentor",
the suggested correction is "Gandon". Submitted by Carol Foisy.
The following comment was attached: A mispelling of Guindon, I believe this is the person in 1881Antoine Emont h/hold, in Clarence.
|
|