Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
@ next to the line number indicates contact information for someone researching this person, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		8	Johnson D	M		Head	M	Oct 17	1836	64
2		8	Johnson Anne	F		Wife	M	Mar 15	1832	68
3		8	Johnson Mary	F		Daughter	S	Oct 15	1869	32
4		8	Leckie ?alm	M		Lodger	S	Oct 15	1869	32
5		8	St Louis James O.	M		Labourer	S			16
6		9	Hudson H.E.	M		Head	M	Oct 9	1868	33
7		9	Hudson Maggie?	F		Wife	M	Sep 1	1870	30
8		9	Hudson Jack	M		Son	S	Nov 24	1894	6
9		9	Hudson Edna	F		Daughter	S	Feb 7	1896	4
10		9	Hudson Dortha	F		Daughter	S	Apr 6	1898	2
11		10	Miller J.E.H.	M		Head	M	Nov 4	1854	46
12		10	Miller Mrs. M.L.	F		Wife	M	Aug 13	1887	43
13		10	Miller M.R.	M		Son	S	Feb 25	1877	23
14		10	Miller M.E.R.	F		Daughter	S	Jan 31	1880	20
15		10	Miller P.H.	M		Son	S	Oct 9	1882	18
16		10	Miller O.R.	M		Son	S	Apr 6	188?	14
17		10	Miller J.H.	M		Son	S	Feb 19	1892	8
18		11	McKay James	M		Head	M	Feb 20	1856	45
19		11	McKay Christine	F		Wife	M	Sep 23	1859	42
20		11	McKay Robt.	M		Son	S	Sep 19	1884	16
21		11	McKay Lorney?	M		Son	S	Dec 30	1887	13
22		11	McKay Ethel	F		Daughter	S	Aug 10	1891	9
23		11	McKay Dora	F		Daughter	S	Jul 24	1894	6
24		11	McKay Harry?	M		Son	S	Jan 31	1897	3
25		11	McKay John E.	M		Son	S	Dec 3	1899	1
@ 26		12	Boehme William	M		Head	M	Dec 17	1853	47
27		12	Boehme Louisa	F		Wife	M	Mar 20	1865	36
28		12	Boehme Annie M.	F		Daughter	S	May 14	1888	22
29		12	Boehme Herman	M		Son	S	Feb 19	1890	11
30		12	Boehme Willie	M		Son	S	Jan 23	1891	10
31		12	Brisk Minnie	F		Servant	S	Mar 19	1880	21
32		12	Boheme Herman	M		?	S	Nov 11	1879	21
33		12	Ziebell?	F		Lodger	S	Dec 22	1827	73
34		13	Loviless? Peter	M		Head	M	Jan 26	1832	69
35		13	Loviless? Abigil	F		Wife	M	Sep 13	1834	66
36		13	Loviless? George	M		Son	S	Feb 1	1866	35
37		13	Loviless? Wellington	M		Son	S	Sep 19	1869	31
38		13	Loviless? Peter J?	M		Son	S	Aug 26	1873	27
39		13	Loviless? Lorenzo	M		Son	S	May 26	1876	24
40		13	Sine Maude	F		Granddaughter	S	Jan 16	1883	18
41		14	Mahon Richard	M		Head	M	Mar 8	1872	29
42		14	Mahon Maggie	F		Wife	M	Jul 11	1872	28
43		14	Mahon Mary	F		Daughter	S	Dec 26	1894	6
44		14	Mahon ?	F		Daughter	S	Dec 28	1895	5
45		14	Mahon Thomas	M		Son	S	Jun 12	1897	3
46		14	Mahon James H.	M		Son	S	Oct 30	1899	1
47		14	Tabb? Louise	F		Cousin	W	Jan	1849	52
48		15	Foster? Joseph	M		Head	M	Feb	1826	75
49		15	Foster? ?	F		Wife	M	Oct 16	1830	70
50		15	Foster? ?	M		Grandson	S	Aug 20	1896	4

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
4		8	Leckie	?alm	M		Lodger	S	Oct 15	1869	32
On line 4, the value for the givens field is "Ba?", the suggested correction is "Calm.?". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: I have checked the image of the original form and decided to make a change other than what the correction suggested.
Field Value Correction Note
16		10	Miller	O.R.	M		Son	S	Apr 6	188?	14
On line 16, the value for the year field is "1885", the suggested correction is "1888". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: I have checked the image of the original form and decided to make a change other than what the correction suggested.
Field Value Correction Note
33		12	Ziebell?		F		Lodger	S	Dec 22	1827	73
On line 33, the value for the givens field is "?", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: The suggested change has been made
Field Value Correction Note
33		12	Ziebell?		F		Lodger	S	Dec 22	1827	73
On line 33, the value for the surname field is "Siebell?", the suggested correction is "Ziebell". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: The suggested change has been made
Field Value Correction Note
35		13	Loviless?	Abigil	F		Wife	M	Sep 13	1834	66
On line 35, the value for the surname field is "Loviless?", the suggested correction is "Loveless?". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: all the LOV (I) LESS entries should be LOV (E) LESS
Field Value Correction Note
38		13	Loviless?	Peter J?	M		Son	S	Aug 26	1873	27
On line 38, the value for the givens field is "Peter James", the suggested correction is "Peter Jr.". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil. The following comment was attached: Jr., not Jas.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: I have checked the image of the original form and decided to make a change other than what the correction suggested.
Field Value Correction Note
44		14	Mahon	?	F		Daughter	S	Dec 28	1895	5
On line 44, the value for the givens field is "?", the suggested correction is """. Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: ditto mark - both the first and second daughter were named Mary
Field Value Correction Note
47		14	Tabb?	Louise	F		Cousin	W	Jan	1849	52
On line 47, the value for the day field is "[ ]", the suggested correction is "3". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
47		14	Tabb?	Louise	F		Cousin	W	Jan	1849	52
On line 47, the value for the givens field is "Louise", the suggested correction is "Lousie". Submitted anonymously.
Field Value Correction Note
47		14	Tabb?	Louise	F		Cousin	W	Jan	1849	52
On line 47, the value for the surname field is "Tabb?", the suggested correction is "Tabb". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: This is Lucy Ann Mahon, wife of Richard Tabb
Field Value Correction Note
48		15	Foster?	Joseph	M		Head	M	Feb	1826	75
On line 48, the value for the surname field is "Foster?", the suggested correction is "Foster". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil. The following comment was attached: Agree
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
48		15	Foster?	Joseph	M		Head	M	Feb	1826	75
On line 48, the value for the day field is "[ ]", the suggested correction is "10". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
49		15	Foster?	?	F		Wife	M	Oct 16	1830	70
On line 49, the value for the givens field is "?", the suggested correction is "Annie?". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
50		15	Foster?	?	M		Grandson	S	Aug 20	1896	4
On line 50, the value for the surname field is "?", the suggested correction is "Foster". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
50		15	Foster?	?	M		Grandson	S	Aug 20	1896	4
On line 50, the value for the givens field is "?", the suggested correction is "John". Submitted by Lesley O'Neil.
This correction was evaluated by Diane Cardinal: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.

Researcher contact information

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: l-1 District: RENFREW (South/Sud) National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com