Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		74	Gustafson Frank	M		Head	M	Apr 4	1864	36
2		75	St. Charles F. X.	M		Lodger	S	?	?	45
3		75	Stappard John R	M		Lodger	S	Jul 15	1866	34
4
5		76	Wells Wilmer C	M		Head	M	Jun	1839	61
6		76	Wells George P.	M		Son	S	Jan 23	1870	31
7		76	Wells James D	M		Son	S	Sep 25	1872	28
8
9		76	Wells Ethel *	F		Daughter-in-Law	M	Jun 11	1873	27
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20		77	Pedley David S.	M		Head	S	Jun 21	1870	30
21		78	Morrison Daniel	M		Head	S	Aug	1853	47
22		79	Smith Com H	M		Head	S	Jan 10	1865	35
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
1		74	Gustafson	Frank	M		Head	M	Apr 4	1864	36
On line 1, the value for the household field is "74", the suggested correction is "72". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
2		75	St. Charles	F. X.	M		Lodger	S	?	?	45
On line 2, the value for the household field is "75", the suggested correction is "72". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
3		75	Stappard	John R	M		Lodger	S	Jul 15	1866	34
On line 3, the value for the household field is "75", the suggested correction is "72". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
4
On line 4, the value for the sex field is "M", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
4
On line 4, the value for the household field is "[ ]", the suggested correction is "". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
4
On line 4, the value for the otherRelationship field is "Head", the suggested correction is "". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
4
On line 4, the value for the maritalStatus field is "S", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
4
On line 4, the value for the otherRelationship field is "Head", the suggested correction is "". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
5		76	Wells	Wilmer C	M		Head	M	Jun	1839	61
On line 5, the value for the household field is "76", the suggested correction is "73". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
6		76	Wells	George P.	M		Son	S	Jan 23	1870	31
On line 6, the value for the household field is "76", the suggested correction is "73". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
7		76	Wells	James D	M		Son	S	Sep 25	1872	28
On line 7, the value for the household field is "76", the suggested correction is "73". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
8
On line 8, the value for the maritalStatus field is "S", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
8
On line 8, the value for the sex field is "M", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
8
On line 8, the value for the relationship field is "Head", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
8
On line 8, the value for the household field is "[ ]", the suggested correction is "73". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -. The following comment was attached: this line is crossed out
Field Value Correction Note
9		76	Wells	Ethel *	F		Daughter-in-Law	M	Jun 11	1873	27
On line 9, the value for the relationship field is "Daughter-in-Law", the suggested correction is "Head". Submitted anonymously.
Field Value Correction Note
10
On line 10, the value for the relationship field is "Head", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
10
On line 10, the value for the sex field is "M", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
10
On line 10, the value for the maritalStatus field is "S", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
11
On line 11, the value for the sex field is "M", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
11
On line 11, the value for the maritalStatus field is "S", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
11
On line 11, the value for the relationship field is "Head", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
12
On line 12, the value for the sex field is "M", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
12
On line 12, the value for the relationship field is "Head", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
12
On line 12, the value for the maritalStatus field is "S", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
13
On line 13, the value for the maritalStatus field is "S", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
13
On line 13, the value for the relationship field is "Head", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
13
On line 13, the value for the sex field is "M", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
14
On line 14, the value for the sex field is "M", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
14
On line 14, the value for the maritalStatus field is "S", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
14
On line 14, the value for the relationship field is "Head", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
15
On line 15, the value for the sex field is "M", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
15
On line 15, the value for the relationship field is "Head", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
15
On line 15, the value for the maritalStatus field is "S", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
16
On line 16, the value for the maritalStatus field is "S", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
16
On line 16, the value for the sex field is "M", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
16
On line 16, the value for the relationship field is "Head", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
17
On line 17, the value for the givens field is "[?]", the suggested correction is "Knau". Submitted anonymously.
Field Value Correction Note
17
On line 17, the value for the maritalStatus field is "S", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
17
On line 17, the value for the relationship field is "Head", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
17
On line 17, the value for the sex field is "M", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
18
On line 18, the value for the maritalStatus field is "S", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
18
On line 18, the value for the relationship field is "Head", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
18
On line 18, the value for the sex field is "M", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
19
On line 19, the value for the sex field is "M", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
19
On line 19, the value for the maritalStatus field is "S", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
19
On line 19, the value for the relationship field is "Head", the suggested correction is " ". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
20		77	Pedley	David S.	M		Head	S	Jun 21	1870	30
On line 20, the value for the household field is "77", the suggested correction is "74". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
21		78	Morrison	Daniel	M		Head	S	Aug	1853	47
On line 21, the value for the household field is "78", the suggested correction is "75". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.
Field Value Correction Note
22		79	Smith	Com H	M		Head	S	Jan 10	1865	35
On line 22, the value for the household field is "79", the suggested correction is "76". Submitted by Helen MV Smith -.

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: d-3 District: YALE & CARIBOO National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com