Home / 1852 / Canada East / Ottawa (county) / 263 Clarendon township / p. 12d, 13a, (79)  Split view

Line Name Occupation Place of Birth Religion Residence if out of limits Age Sex
1 Seaman, Samuel Farmer Ireland Protestant   54 M
2 Seaman, Jane   Ireland Protestant   36 F
3 Seaman, William   Canada Protestant   18 M
4 Seaman, Charity   Canada Protestant   16 F
5 Seaman, John   Canada Protestant   13 M
6 Seaman, Samuel   Canada Protestant   11 M
7 Seaman, Matilda   Canada Protestant   9 F
8 Seaman, Margaret   Canada Protestant   7 F
9 Seaman, Thomas   Canada Protestant   5 M
10 Seaman, Eliza   Canada Protestant   2 F
11 Harriss, Robert Farmer Ireland Protestant   59 M
12 Harriss, Jane   Ireland Protestant   59 F
13 Harriss, Henderson   Canada Protestant   20 M
14 Harriss, James   Canada Protestant   16 M
15 Stephens, Thomas Farmer Ireland Protestant   54 M
16 Stephens, Caroline   Ireland Protestant   44 F
17 Stephens, Margaret   Canada Protestant   20 F
 18 Stephens, Mary   Canada Protestant   18 M
 19 Stephens, James   Canada Protestant   14 F
20 Stephens, Elizabeth   Canada Protestant   16 F
21 Stephens, Henrietta   Canada Protestant   12 F
22 McNeil, Charles Carpenter Canada Protestant   23 M
23 Armstrong, Francis Farmer Ireland Wesleyan Methodist   42 M
24 Armstrong, Ann   Ireland Wesleyan Methodist   34 F
25 Armstrong, John   Ireland Wesleyan Methodist   10 M
26 Armstrong, Elizabeth   Canada Wesleyan Methodist   8 F
27 Armstrong, Margaret Jane   Canada Wesleyan Methodist   6 F
28 Armstrong, Ann   Canada Wesleyan Methodist   4 F
29 Armstrong, Francis   Canada Wesleyan Methodist   2 M
30 Hodgins, Francis Farmer Canada Protestant   25 M
31          
32          
33          
34          
35          
36          
37          
38          
39          
40          
41          
42          
43          
44          
45          
46          
47          
48          
49          
50          

Notes have been added to the following lines:
Line 18: It would appear the enumerator confused the "Gender" field in lines 18 and 19.
Line 19: It would appear the enumerator confused the "Gender" field in lines 18 and 19.

Return to subdistrict